“This young woman was very good at telling this story.”
“It’s reckless, it’s cavalier and it’s intentional.”
“I understood what it’s like to be lied to by Jackie.”
“I feel like my interpretation was different than what was written”
“The person I had talked to was not the person I was familiar with from my story.”
Why is the media still protecting Jackie’s identity?
“too vague and remote”
Catfishing lure retrieved.
Plus: Another Erdely story teetering?
Will reporters demand accountability on other Rolling Stone stories?
Rolling Stone: Nothing changes, and no one gets fired … not even Erdely.
Standing American jurisprudence on its head.
Greater Truths independent of actual truths.
“I couldn’t help but notice that everything that the article said about me was incorrect.”
Erdely sanctioned at Penn for fabulism by …
Plus, another Erdely/Rolling Stone story with holes in it?
Serious charges, serious response.
Not so much
In the Senate, anyway.