Laugh if you must but it’s no goofier than the idea that “due process” implies a substantive right to kill …
Get off his damn lawn.
“We avow the First Amendment.”
“Both the bible and the Constitution were well intentioned, but they are basically, inherently flawed.”
Ushering in a second new era of ‘unprecedented openness in government’?
Meet the new boss.
Saying “that’s only good for killing PEOPLE” is not a disqualifier
“Public sentiment had swung”
Is this what victory looks like?
Back on offense.
“I know the Constitution. This bill is ironclad. It is ironclad.”
“What is left, if the government can do this?”
“All of the predictions, including mine, that the justices would not have a problem with this law were wrong.”
Moment of truth.
“The liberty to pursue happiness.”
“Clearly, more work needs to be done …”
Do not follow.
“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.”
The limits of presidential power
No, you can’t.
We do, we do, we do.
Learning curves taken.
Be careful what you wish for
“Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation…”
New kids on the (eastern) block