I rarely find myself agreeing with Jill Filipovic but her articles and tweets are sometimes interesting as a kind of reference point, i.e. how do far-left feminists rationalize this or that? Yesterday she really outdid herself with a tweet that, I think, was intended to give conservatives second thoughts about saying no to gender affirming care for minors. Because, hey, if we can't allow that, then we probably shouldn't allow...wait for it...nose jobs for teens either.
Today In: "False Equivalences Are False"...https://t.co/9JqAQtdDdc
— Liberrocky (@liberrocky) February 19, 2026
If you're wondering why I'm using someone's screengrab of this, it's because Filipovic deleted her tweet, apparently after realizing it was not the genius point she thought it was.
For starters, nose jobs and hormone therapy are not remotely the same thing. Neither are boob jobs to accentuate your feminine appearance the same as boob jobs to remove your breasts. The former is a reversible surgery the latter is not. Women who have their breasts removed as teens won't be able to breast feed if they ever have a change of mind.
So the comparison she is making is silly. And yet! I think a lot of people on the right would be willing to agree to this deal. If this is Jill Filipovic's solution to the Gordian Knot of trans policy for minors in America, I'm ready to accept this deal. On the plus side, no more kids getting life-changing surgeries before they can even vote or drink legally. On the downside, some kid with a crooked nose might have to wait until 18 to get a nose job. If that's what the left thinks is fair, let's go with that.
Your terms are acceptable. https://t.co/Jx5HC5JP6f
— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) February 19, 2026
Mmhmm. Yes. Your terms are acceptable. https://t.co/uZgY7JKUq9
— Kimberly Ross (@SouthernKeeks) February 19, 2026
Your terms are acceptable. https://t.co/B4SxfFKV1w
— RBe (@RBPundit) February 19, 2026
Your terms are acceptable. https://t.co/yqNjSshc6c
— Amy Curtis (@RantyAmyCurtis) February 19, 2026
There are lots more like this. It became a thing. To sum up:
Every conservative in America:
— AK Kamara (@realakkamara) February 19, 2026
Your terms are acceptable 🫱🏾🫲🏻 pic.twitter.com/a0aWKGmVFk
People began to wonder why Filipovic thought this was clever in the first place.
Imagine being Jill Filipovic and thinking that "OK, well then no boob jobs for 16 year olds!!" is a compelling argument... pic.twitter.com/jwWf4aX5dN
— Eupeptic Joe (@jmotivator) February 19, 2026
It’s a false comparison — permanently sterilizing children isn’t really comparable to unnecessary plastic surgery — but yes.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) February 19, 2026
It must have come as a surprise to her. She did delete it after all once it was clearly not going her way.
These comments aren't going the way you expected, are they?
— NotVoltaire (@not_voltaire) February 19, 2026
That's because you don't know anything about the people who think differently from you.
Conservatives understand leftists better than leftists understand conservatives. That's how you get blunders like Filipovic's tweet.
The Jill Filipovic tweet about elective surgery is a landmark. It reveals as few things ever have what life inside the left-liberal bubble is like as those inside imagine they understand the non-liberal perspective and think they know how to trip it up, when the opposite is true
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) February 19, 2026
What apparently got this ball rolling was a post yesterday in which polling showed that Democrats were getting clobbered on trans issues, not just among conservatives but among most Americans.
In almost everything we polled, the public — including wide swaths of Democrats — is aligned with the conservative view on trans issues
— Lakshya Jain (@lxeagle17) February 17, 2026
🔴Gender surgery for minors: -35
🔴HRT for minors: -23
🔴Bathroom bills: -19
🔴K-12 sports: -35
🔴Gender identity in elementary school: -15 pic.twitter.com/OPjpb4H7NI
Filipovic pronounced it depressing.
This is so depressing. Not that long ago, opposition to bathroom bills was an animating force among liberals, and those bills were defeated. Now, the basic rights of trans people to live with freedom and dignity are at risk. https://t.co/ZK5oazhYKQ
— Jill Filipovic (@JillFilipovic) February 17, 2026
Ultimately, she did make an admission against interest about what went wrong here. Progressive activists acted like lunatics and told normies "Shup up, bigots!" That backfired and a lot of people (many of whom started out with a willingness to compromise) gave up and just said no to the more extreme demands.
The anti-trans movement just outplayed progressives on this one, and I think progressives made a real error by trying to shout down normie concerns (fairness in sports, surgeries on adolescents) as bigotry rather than engaging in some tough questions. The anti-trans movement did…
— Jill Filipovic (@JillFilipovic) February 17, 2026
I've said this before but I'll say it again. Where the activists crossed a line was when they made other people's children part of their demands for social acceptance. You want to teach what to my 6-year-old? Nope. Sorry. Take the gender unicorn and shove it, pal. And no, we're not okay with teachers hiding social transitions from parents. And no it's not fine to give hormones to teens who can't drive yet. And while were at it, no men in women's sports, women's locker rooms, women's prisons or women's bathrooms.
Filipovic is right about one thing. The people who hold these views aren't bigots, they're just normal. And because they're normal (and not bigots) they don't appreciate being called bigots when it comes to issues involving their own kids.
Jill's post seems to have disappeared. I wonder if it is the first instance of a post being taken down bc too many people agreed with it. https://t.co/YH71bZJtyB
— David Mastio (@DavidMastio) February 19, 2026
Update: There are so many good responses to this.
Jill's post seems to have disappeared. I wonder if it is the first instance of a post being taken down bc too many people agreed with it. https://t.co/YH71bZJtyB
— David Mastio (@DavidMastio) February 19, 2026
1. Gender surgeries are cosmetic procedures? I thought they were “medically necessary” and “life-saving” ones.
2. I agree, cosmetic surgeries without medical benefit should not be offered to kids.
3. But are the two scenarios comparable? Does rhinoplasty leave you without the ability to smell, just as mastectomy leaves you without the ability to breastfeed? Does cosmetic breast reduction surgery have the same complication rate as vaginoplasty?
4. Are teens who get rhinoplasty told that it will resolve their mental health problems (“dead hook-nosed daughter/live ski-sloped nose daughter”)? Do doctors confirm to kids that a crooked nose was “assigned to them at birth” and ski-slope nose is their true authentic self? If a plastic surgeon said such things to nasally-distressed teens, wouldn’t we find that exploitative?
5. Does insurance pay for a nose job like it pays for gender surgery?
Etc etc
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Hot Air's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join Hot Air VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member