Earlier this month the Trump administration canceled $400 million in grants to Columbia University. In a subsequent move, the timing of which may or may not have been coincidental, Columbia finally punished students who had taken over an academic building last spring. Six students were expelled and 16 more were suspended or had their degrees revoked.

Also last week, the Trump administration sent the school a letter outlining 9 things it needed to do if it wanted the grants restored. Here's the full list:

That letter concluded by saying Columbia had one week to comply. That week would expire tomorrow, March 20.

Today, Columbia's interim president Katrina Armstrong published a letter in response signaling that the school is ready to work with federal regulators. It's a bit long but here's a portion of it.

Understandably, many inside and outside of our community have voiced concern, asking how we will respond. Some have examined each pre-condition on its own, weighing the acceptable versus the intolerable. Many bristle at the very idea that an institution like ours—an institution whose very value is premised on free inquiry and free expression—should ever be subject to such a list.

Let me be clear about our path forward: it is our utmost responsibility to uphold and deliver on our academic mission, always. We are committed to doing what’s right for Columbia and will not waver from our principles and the values of academic freedom and free expression that have guided this institution for the last 270 years...

Legitimate questions about our practices and progress can be asked, and we will answer them. But we will never compromise our values of pedagogical independence, our commitment to academic freedom, or our obligation to follow the law.

We will also continue — as is our responsibility and as we have done throughout our history — to engage in constructive dialogue with our federal regulators, including on the work we are doing to address antisemitism, harassment, and discrimination, the tangible progress we are making, and the intensity of our commitment to this ongoing work.

The response does not seem that clear cut to me. It never says if the school intends to meet the nine demands spelled out in the original letter. Nevertheless, the Wall Street Journal reported shortly before the letter was released that Columbia was on the verge of yielding.

Columbia University is getting close to yielding to President Trump’s demands in negotiations to restore $400 million in federal funding, according to people close to the discussions...

Trustees have been huddled for days. Progress has been one step forward, two steps back, with some board members deeply concerned the university is trading away its moral authority and academic independence for federal funds. Others have argued the school has limited options because it relies on federal money. 

The leadership is also concerned about the optics of the Trump administration dictating policy at Columbia, which is one of the most historically left-leaning elite institutions in the U.S. Officials worry about backlash from faculty and possible protests when students return from spring break next week.

Apparently the sticking point is point #8 which involves putting the Middle East, South Asian, and African Studies department under academic receivership. The WSJ says having Trump demand such an outcome was "unpalatable" to many on the faculty. So I don't think they've agreed to that yet. Still if we get a mask ban, a definition of antisemitism and a real plan to hold students accountable, that would be a big step forward.

Columbia's student paper hasn't published a story about this yet so I'm guessing we'll get one complete with lots of blowback from far-left professors later tonight or tomorrow.