So if we decided to establish that we are not individually allowed to bear semi-automatic assault rifles and pistols while still being allowed to own single-shot hunting guns, this would be perfectly in keeping with how we have interpreted our Second Amendment rights under the Constitution.

But it will still make lots of people scream that we have tromped all over the Constitution, even if we haven’t.

So, how about if we limit access to something that factors into every gun massacre that the Constitution doesn’t address at all:


What if we keep semi-automatic weapons freely available but strictly control the manufacture, distribution, and sales of bullets?