The (Un)Scientific American Meltdown

One of the primary reasons this descent into madness has accelerated is that the editor-in-chief, Laura Helmuth, has allowed pseudoscience and narratives to flow unfiltered with little if any restraint.

Advertisement

Flush with power after the apparent success of endorsing Biden in 2020, Helmuth and the team at Scientific American endorsed Harris in this election cycle.  Their faulty reasoning and inanity-filled platitudes were met with mocking. But I am sure Helmuth and her crew were sure they positioned Harris for success.

However, when the popular votes were counted and the electoral ones tallied, President Donald J. Trump clearly prevailed.  Arguably, Americans were voting against the progressive agenda that the magazine was pushing.

Once the magnitude of the Trump win became apparent, Helmuth lost all sense of professional decorum and scientific objectivity, and had herself a spectacular social media meltdown.

Ed Morrissey

One value of social media is that it allows us to see how people truly are. That's worth $90 a year for a Twitter/X subscription all on its own. 

Helmuth eventually apologized ... and locked her account. Leslie has more, so click over and read it all. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement