The Kamaloptics Were Worse Than We Predicted

Bringing Walz with her was a terrible decision that created much of that hilariously bad optic. Her answers were empty, even when the hideous Bash offered her softball questions with multiple-choice answers:

Advertisement

Generally speaking, how should voters look at some of the changes that you’ve made — that you explained some of here — in your policy? Is it because you have more experience now, and you’ve learned more about the information? Is it because you’re running for president in a Democratic primary?

One can only imagine how poorly Kamala did in the parts of the interview far-left CNN likely edited out.

The optics, though. Sheesh. Was Kamala hoping that with Walz and Bash on either side of her, she would look like the ChairCackler of the Board? Was that the idea? Well, instead, the vibe was pure Bugsy Malone — an intellectual child failing at playing grown-up.

Ed Morrissey

Everyone wondered why Walz ended up towering over Harris in the staging of the interview. It looked weird, as though he was there to supervise Harris. And maybe that's not just optics. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement