1. The faux outrage over the use of blind sources is especially rich coming from political staffers in both parties
— Michael LaRosa (@MichaelLaRosaDC) June 5, 2024
2. What credible or objective reporter/outlet actually WANTS to take the same on the record quotes from provided by the WH's approved list of surrogates to offer… https://t.co/es7GxkSLKa
3. If age is clearly still THIS sensitive for the WH at this stage, then WTF wouldn't they provide the @WSJ w/ powerful voices who are in the room with POTUS every single day and know him best or work closely with him ... to go ON THE RECORD (unscripted and authentic)!? @FLOTUS, Valerie, Zients, Blinkin, Naomi Biden, Ashley Biden, Barack Obama, Bill/Hillary Clinton! C'mon on now! Would any legacy newspaper, including the WSJ, ever turn down or kill a quote from any of those voices???? C'mon now. ...
5. Let's not pretend like we don't know what happens to Democrats who regurgitate unfiltered, unapproved, and unscripted analysis. Why would ANY of the 20 Democratic Admin officials and lawmakers who spoke to the @WSJ go on the record with their candid impressions?
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.