Does the Verdict Awaken Trump’s Unlikely Voters?

Intuitively enough, marginal voters tend not to participate in the political process because they don’t see that exercise as especially productive. They tend to be disaffected with the political system, and they seek changes to it that more conventional voters and politicians regard as radical. The polling of marginal voters ahead of this election has also shown that those voters see Trump as more of a change agent than Joe Biden. That was one of Trump’s strengths in 2016. As a former president backed by the Republican Party establishment, that aura had dissipated some. The verdicts upend that dynamic. Trump’s convictions render the former president an outlaw — the ultimate outsider. If the “scandal” these voters are processing is filtered through a tabloid prism, they’re just as likely to be enlivened by it as they are to be repulsed.

Advertisement

As Silver concludes, conventional political physics dictates that Joe Biden should see some signals in the data that suggest the public will not reward a convicted felon with their votes. If no such signal materializes or if the presumptive GOP presidential nominee enjoys a bump in the polls, it would help establish which standard voters are applying to Trump.

Ed Morrissey

I tend to see this somewhat differently. This case has gotten a lot of attention in the MSM, and the trial even more so, with all sorts of competing analyses. Even on MSNBC and more so on CNN, analysts began to report with deepening skepticism about the case and the way Judge Juan Merchan handled it. Elie Honig has been nearly apoplectic about the prosecution in this case on CNN, and now today in NY Mag, as John covered for us.

Those voters aren't going to parse that through the lens of celebrity. They'll process it in the context of kangaroo courts and election interference. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement