Minnesota Narrowly Avoids Ranked-Choice Voting ... For Now

HF3276 would give all cities, counties and school districts across Minnesota the ability to implement ranked-choice voting for their elections. But with just 66 DFL legislators voting to support the “local options” ranked-choice voting proposal on the last day of session, the bill fell short of the 68 votes required to pass in the House of Representatives.

Advertisement

The three House DFLers who cast ‘no” votes were: Gene Pelowski of Winona, Rick Hanson of South St. Paul and Michael Nelson of Brooklyn Park — none of whom rose to explain their opposition to the bill during a floor debate.

News that the bill had failed on the House floor was disappointing to professional and volunteer activists with FairVote Minnesota, an organization that takes in well more than $1 million annually to help turn Minnesota into a ranked-choice voting state, among other progressive voter reform issues it champions.

Ed Morrissey

RCV is a complicated disaster, a system which makes elections even more opaque and inscrutable. Supposedly this avoid the necessity of run-off elections and encourages moderate candidates, but it generally only produces progressive victories and creates clouds of confusion and delay. States and cities can avoid runoffs by adopting the straightforward and traditional first-past-the-post policy, ie, most votes wins regardless of percentages. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement