Cohen Demolition on Cross-Examination Reveals the Grift to Jury

With the dramatic implosion of Michael Cohen on the stand on Thursday with the exposure of another alleged lie told under oath, even hosts and commentators on CNN are now criticizing the prosecution and doubting the basis for any conviction. CNN anchor Anderson Cooper admitted that he would “absolutely” have doubts after Cohen’s testimony. CNN’s legal analyst Elie Honig declared “I don’t think I’ve ever seen a star cooperating witness get his knees chopped out quite as clearly and dramatically.” He previously stated that this case would never have been brought outside of a deep blue, anti-Trump district. 

Advertisement

Other legal experts, including on CNN and MSNBC, admitted that they did not get the legal theory of the prosecution or understand the still mysterious crime that was being concealed by the alleged book-keeping errors.  The question is whether the jury itself is realizing that they are being played by the prosecution.

Ed Morrissey

The acute question at hand is whether Judge Juan Merchan realizes just how much this has all been exposed, especially in the Cohen cross-examination. He will have the opportunity to put this to a quick end when the Bragg team rests its case at the end of Cohen's testimony, at which point the defense will move for a directed verdict of acquittal. That would be Merchan's best option at this point, especially if the defense calls Robert Costello to the stand to start talking about Cohen's reliability. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement