Biden Aid Suspension Sure Looks Impeachable

President Trump ordered the suspension of $391 million in vital military assistance urgently needed by Ukraine, a strategic partner, to resist Russian aggression. Because the aid was appropriated by Congress, on a bipartisan basis, and signed into law by the president, its expenditure was required by law. Acting directly and through his subordinates within the U.S. government, the president withheld from Ukraine this military assistance without any legitimate foreign policy, national security, or anticorruption justification. The president did so despite the longstanding bipartisan support of Congress, uniform support across federal departments and agencies for the provision to Ukraine of the military assistance, and his obligations under the Impoundment Control Act.

Advertisement
Just switch Ukraine for Israel and Hamas for Russia, and the rest of the paragraph reads exactly the same. Except, of course, that Trump denied he had put an improper hold on the aid, and President Biden has not.

Just how bad is it for a president to withhold congressionally approved military aid to another country? And to do this to a democratic ally facing an existential war? Why, it is nothing short of an "abuse of power"—or at least that is how then-candidate for President Joe Biden described it in 2020.

Ed Morrissey

Technically, anything can be grounds for impeachment if Congress deems it as such ... especially in the last few years. Congress had far better grounds for a Biden impeachment over abandoning 14,000 Americans to the Taliban, but chose not to do so.

Also even more technically, the arms that got suspended were apparently from an earlier authorization, not the arms Congress authorized in the aid package. But Congress nonetheless authorized the suspended shipment, so the initial White House spin on the technicality was hardly convincing. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement