The Futile Plot to Wreck the Democrat Convention

Is a repeat of the 1968 disruption possible in the context of 2024? Or is the stability of 2004 the more relevant precedent and probable outcome?

From 1968 to today, responsibility for protecting political conventions has shifted from cities and states to the federal government. This new federal responsibility was formalized in a directive signed by President Bill Clinton in 1998. The order created a category of “National Special Security Events,” for which planning would be led by the Secret Service.

Advertisement

National Security Special Events draw on all the resources of the federal government, including, if need be, those of the Defense Department. In 2016, the federal government spent $50 million on security for each of the two major-party conventions.

Ed Morrissey

Unless you've attended conventions in the years after 1998, you have no idea how isolated they are. I attended GOP conventions in 2004, 2008, and 2016 on media passes, and the layers of security circles were bonkers. The only one that really worried me was my first in 2004 thanks to the then-recent 9/11 attacks, but it was almost absurdly insulated from the rest of NYC. We got outside the security layers a little more in 2008, but only because it was in the Twin Cities and I didn't bother with a hotel room. I don't think we did anything in Cleveland in 2016 that wasn't at the hotel or inside the security perimeters.

That doesn't mean that radicals won't try to foment riots. But those will be so far away from the convention in Chicago that they might as well incite them in Gary. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement