Flashback: Columbia U Called Terrorism 'A Form of Protesting' After 9/11

Advertisement

Just two months after the September 11 terrorist attack on the United States, Columbia University’s president Minouche Shafik remarked that terrorism was a “form of protesting against a system,” according to a video unearthed by The Daily Wire. 

Shafik, who was a vice president at the World Bank at the time, was asked about the economic roots of terrorism in developing countries during an event with the University of California-Berkeley’s Institute of International Studies. While she condemned “extreme views” held by terrorist groups, she said the reason they are popular is because terrorism is a “protest.”


“You’ll always have individuals who will have extreme views,” Shafik said at the November 2001 event, “but what’s really troubling in the region is that there’s actually quite a broad base of society which has some sympathy for the terrorists, not so much because they approve of their methods, but it’s a form of protesting against a system which is not delivering for them on the economic or the political front.”

Ed Morrissey

Explains a lot about Shafik's tenure at Columbia, no?

I'll caveat this in one way: Shafik does imply that this is a bad thing in these remarks, calling it "troubling." She isn't advising us to treat it as a form of legitimate political protest. 

However, Shafik had her head up her nether regions in another and more fundamental way by ascribing this to "economic or ... political" issues. Terrorism in this region has little to do with either, but instead with extreme religious beliefs that create a totalitarian agenda. The 9/11 attacks were fueled by jihadism, not by economic policies. And the same thing is true of Hamas and of Iran, which sponsors most of the jihadist terrorism in the region. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement