Could SCOTUS Kick the Struts Out from Under J6 Convictions?

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up Fischer v. United States, a case that could fundamentally change many cases of January 6th defendants, including the prosecution of former president Donald Trump. The case involves the interpretation of a federal statute prohibiting obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations. ...

Advertisement

The law itself was not designed for this purpose. It was part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and has been described as “prompted by the exposure of Enron’s massive accounting fraud and revelations that the company’s outside auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP, had systematically destroyed potentially incriminating documents.”

Ed Morrissey

Interesting. Congressional intent matters, but one has to wonder if the "textualist" tendency among the conservatives might dilute that argument. The J6 rioters were also convicted for unlawful entry and in some cases for violence, and a reversal here would not negate those convictions. But the lengthy sentences some received may have to be reversed or commuted if the court decides that this statute doesn't apply. Don't expect an outcome on this until the end of the term in late June. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement