Trump Hush-Money Trial Begins as Experts Scratch Heads

Brought by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg, the case was considered dead three years ago, when Bragg's predecessor and federal prosecutors abandoned it. But Bragg, who campaigned on his record suing the Trump administration more than a hundred times as a deputy in the New York state attorney general’s office, revived the case in 2021, filing felony charges against Trump last year alleging he had falsified the business records pertaining to the Daniels payments.

Advertisement

A number of legal experts have questioned Bragg's decision to seek felony charges in the case.

In New York, charges over falsified business records are typically brought as misdemeanors and are "rarely the senior offense in an indictment," according to the Financial Times. For the crime to rise to a felony, prosecutors must prove that the defendant falsified records to "commit or conceal another crime."

Ed Morrissey

This is one of the more egregious examples of lawfare against Trump, the other being Letitia James' lawsuit. Both of these should have been thrown out before trial. Not only is hush money not a crime, even the 'records' issue Bragg is bringing is not worthy of prosecution. Just as with James' lawsuit, there are no victims -- and this case rests on the testimony of a multiple perjurer to boot. It's Kafka-esque. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement