The Hollywoke Meltdown

“If you want to send a message, try Western Union,” Frank Capra once said about blatant preachiness on film. Yet Capra was a master at instilling moralistic philosophy into his pictures, except he did it with heartwarming stories about virtuous people in some of the greatest films of all time. Modern filmmakers both dismiss that aspect of the craft and lack the skill to create anything close to It Happened One NightMr. Deeds Goes to TownMr. Smith Goes to WashingtonMeet John Doe, and It’s a Wonderful Life.

Advertisement

But in 2001, they found a loftier goal than the genius director who immortalized the year, Stanley Kubrick with 2001: A  Space Odyssey, which was attacking the War on Terror and the American men fighting it. They made an unprecedented number of antiwar pictures slamming those heroes as ignorant pawns or psychopaths — American SoldiersRedacted (about the rape and murder of a 15-year-old Iraqi girl by U.S. soldiers), Stop-LossThe Mark of CainHome of the BraveGreen ZoneIn the Valley of Elah (a peacenik bridge too far for director Robert Redford) — while our guys were in harm’s way.

Every one of these films lost money, yet they kept coming throughout the whole decade, forming the first deliberate gap between Hollywood and the unwanted “deplorable” audience. 

Ed Morrissey

I don't know if that was really the first such gap, but perhaps the most pronounced. My recollection is that the trend started much earlier, in the early 1980s as a reaction to the gritty, independent, and more honest filmmaking of the 1970s. That's when manliness first started being a vice in cinema rather than a virtue and "messaging" became more common and less honest. And even in the 1970s, we had plenty of antiwar, anti-hero films "while our guys were in harm's way," and certainly in the immediate aftermath of Vietnam.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement