'The Lab-Leak Cover-Up Is Damaging Science'

O’Neill: Isn’t this attitude to the lab-leak theory, insisting that the debate is over both in academia and in public life, fundamentally anti-science?

Ridley: It certainly is. Science has progressed magnificently over the past few centuries because it has been decentralised, creating an environment where ideas can be rigorously challenged. One professor at Oxford was free to tell another professor at Cambridge that he’s talking utter nonsense, and vice versa. That’s a vital part of the scientific process. Without it, the Oxford or Cambridge professor can easily go down a rabbit hole of confirmation bias and motivated reasoning that may blind him to contrary evidence. There must always be a process to challenge other scientists.

Advertisement

Ed Morrissey

We have stopped doing science, and instead are doing "science" these days. Government funds a great deal of research, which has corrupted the process both directly and indirectly. Research that rebuts government agendas get suppressed -- explicitly so during the pandemic -- and that's bad enough. But the incentives in this system have corrupted research in another way, by shifting resources to gov't political priorities in order to compete for the awards and grants in the first place.

We need to get government out of research if we want to return from "science" to actual science. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement