The Honor, and Horror, of the American Samizdat Prize

Like Jay and Miranda I’m sure, I’m honored to be chosen for the Samizdat prize, but also a little horrified that such an award is now necessary. People with dissenting ideas will now have to find alternative ways to distribute. As was the case in the Soviet Union, official news will be unpopular in America because the public will know in advance that it is full of untruths and false narratives — but that won’t translate into instant popularity for true reporting or great satire or comedy, because the reach of these things can be artificially suppressed.

Advertisement

We’re going to need to find new ways of getting the truth to each other, and it’s not clear yet how those networks will work, if they will at all. It may come down to handing each other mimeographed papers in subway tunnels, as they did in Soviet times. We haven’t built that informational underground yet, but no matter what, the first steps will necessarily involve raising awareness that there’s a problem at all. That’s why prizes like this are important, and the agitation and resistance of people like Jay and Miranda and so many others right now are so crucial. We don’t want our speech freedoms to go gentle into that good night; we want them to go kicking and screaming, or better yet, not go at all.

Ed Morrissey

Congratulations to the prize's first winners -- Taibbi, Jay Bhattacharya, and Miranda Devine. Matt's essay puts this issue in stark terms, because it's necessary at this point to wake people up to the threat of Big Brother in the West. This is all about retaining power, and it is all about controlling the masses with a compliant establishment media. 

One might even call this essay "fiesty," if not "fiery" ...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement