"Even if you need an actual conflict, it's there. The evidence is overwhelming. The evidence is overwhelming that they had an affair before ... she hired him. The evidence is overwhelming that she benefited financially from it. The evidence is overwhelming that he was not qualified to do the job and earn $700,000."

He went on to say: "This ought to be a criminal investigation of Fani Willis and the two witnesses ... but I don't know whether the judge will have the courage to actually look and say, I believe you committed perjury. I believe you committed obstruction of justice. I believe you tampered with witnesses. I believe you conspired to commit perjury.

"That would be the right result. But if the judge doesn't have the courage to do that and falls back on an appearance of conflict, then she's making the legal argument that's not enough."