Ed Morrissey

I saw some discussion about the metadata floating around yesterday. Professor Adler does an excellent job in covering it and explaining some of the arguments. 

I must admit, though, that I didn't take any of this seriously. The opinions are the substance, not the metadata. The finished product goes into the record, and the in-chambers discussions mean nothing at all to anyone except the justices involved. To the extent that the finished product lacks synchronicity (which Professor Adler notes), it's likely because the court felt it was necessary to publish this before Colorado's primary and other primaries that might be impacted by it.