Her candidate, Nader, had already been subject to an extraordinary — and extraordinarily underreported — campaign of litigious harassment at the hands of the Democratic Party. John Kerry told Nader he had 2,000 lawyers at his disposal and would do “everything within the law” to win. In Arizona, Nader opponents filed a 650-page challenge to his attempt to get on the ballot, forgetting social justice concerns long enough to complain that one of Nader’s petition-circulators was a felon. They demanded ten samples of Nader’s own signature, hired a forensic examiner to call others into question, and challenged residents of a homeless shelter. The Democratic state chairman, Jim Pederson, said outright, “Our first objective is to keep [Nader] off the ballot,” because “we think it distorts the entire election.”

Now, Amato’s candidate was set to talk with Democratic National Committee chairman (and future Virginia governor) Terry McAuliffe. A high-energy, Clintonesque schmoozer in public, McAuliffe in private was curt and to the point: he didn’t mind Nader running in noncompetitive places, but had an “issue” with 19 states where “a vote for you is a vote for [George] Bush.” He shifted with impressive nonchalance to offer a bribe.

“If you stay out of my 19 states,” he said, “I will help with resources in 31 states.”

[This was largely payback for the 2000 election, the loss of which Dems blamed Nader in Florida for supposedly siphoning off enough votes to allow George W. Bush to win the state and the presidency. Now, Taibbi argues, Democrats are conducting the same lawfare on an industrial scale to prevent *anyone* from challenging Joe Biden, including and especially Donald Trump. He’s got a podcast up for subscribers to his Substack. I subscribe to Taibbi as a kind of check on assumptions, plus he’s a good writer, but he’s definitely doing some powerful work against the anti-democratic Democrats these days. — Ed]