For months, the mainstream news media have described the Censorship Industrial Complex as a conspiracy theory invented by the Twitter Files journalists and Republicans. The New York Times, Washington Post, PBS “Frontline,” and most other news outlets have published story after story claiming that there is an orchestrated effort by people who don’t care about the truth to mischaracterize the work of well-intentioned “misinformation researchers.”

But now, the US Supreme Court has agreed to hear and rule upon the constitutionality of the Censorship Industrial Complex as denounced by the Attorneys General of Missouri and Louisiana in their lawsuit against the Biden administration for demanding censorship by social media platforms of disfavored views on Covid, elections, and other issues.

“We look forward to vindicating the 1st Amendment rights of our clients, and all Americans, in the nation’s highest court,” wrote Jenin Younes, a staff attorney for the New Civil Liberties Association, on X. Younes has been working with Columbia Law Professor, Philip Hamburger, who Public interviewed in July. Together they represent Stanford Professor Jay Bhattacharya, also interviewed by Public in July, former UC Irvine psychiatrist Aaron Kheriaty, Harvard professor, Martin Kulldorff, and others.

[Arguments are gonna be lit af. ~ Beege]