“The basic principle in the criminal justice system is if a prominent person commits a crime and they’re seeking office, that doesn’t give them immunity,” Barr told Fox News. “If there’s enough time to have it resolved before the election, it should be resolved.” …

“Just think, some mayor charged with massive embezzlement and he says, ‘Well, you know, it’s a year and a half to the election, let’s put that on hold while I run for re-election.’ It’s silly,” Barr added.

[I don’t know about “interference,” but at least two of these are clearly politicized and pursued by professed anti-Trump activist DAs: Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis. Jack Smith’s J6 indictment seems like a far stretch too, to where politicization is at least a pretty clear motive. The only one of the four criminal indictments that are on even arguably objective solid ground is the obstruction/classified material indictment. If that was the only indictment in play, this situation would look much different in terms of election manipulation. — Ed]