Speaking of corruption ... the NYT won't

Goldman’s story fastens on Peter Schweizer Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich. With a proclivity to the MSM’s preferred cliché in cases of apparent wrongdoing by figures it favors, Goldman writes: “Republicans seized on the accusations in Mr. Schweizer’s book, accusing Mrs. Clinton of supporting the interests of foundation donors as part of a quid pro quo.”

Advertisement

Goldman’s story is virtually devoid of facts. Who gave what and how much goes missing, as does the basis of Mrs. Clinton’s absolution. …

Goldman’s story does not relate a single fact that Peter Schweizer got wrong. As I read Peter’s books, the point is that much of the corruption he has uncovered is legal, as may be the case with foreign payments to the Bidens in the Biden family business — also uncovered by Peter. Given the vacuity of Goldman’s story today, this seems to be his tacit point.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement