It’s not exactly a sign of a healthy democratic discourse that it’s virtually impossible to ask a critical question about the United States’ role in the Ukraine-Russia conflict without being smeared as a Putin apologist or an “isolationist.”
We’ve been bombarded with bromides about a civilizational struggle that pits the forces of autocracy and liberalism against each other. “It’s not just about freedom in Ukraine,” President Joe Biden tells us. “It’s about freedom of democracy at large.”
Yet Ukraine — which, before the war, regularly slotted in somewhere beneath Burma, Mexico and Hungary on those silly “democracy matrixes” left-wingers used to love — isn’t any kind of liberal democracy. Maybe one day it will be. Today Ukraine still shutters churches and restricts the free press. Maybe you believe those are justifiable actions during wartime, but under no definition are they liberal. Ukraine has never been a functioning “democracy.” Its people defend its borders and sovereignty in the face of a powerful expansionist aggressor. That’s good enough.
[In part, this is created by Biden’s dumb argument. Technically speaking, both Ukraine and Russia are “democracies,” but not terribly authentic ones — especially Russia. Ukraine has spent the last 32 years fighting between corrupt parties that represent pro-Western and pro-Moscow interests, while Putin’s made a mockery of presidential elections. This was isn’t about “freedom of democracy,” but about a rules-based post-imperial international order that is supposed to prevent wars of territorial conquest. That is a crucial matter for the future of our national and global security — and as Harsanyi says, “that’s good enough.” Harsanyi is clearly right on the larger point, too. — Ed]
Join the conversation as a VIP Member