The CCP has never wanted to liberate women; the totalitarian regime has only wanted to “redistribute” women and “optimize” them to its use. Why does the Chinese government refuse to make any real effort to protect women? Because the CCP has determined that the protection given to women should be limited to protecting their value as “sexual resources” and “reproductive machines.”
Hence, the exploitation and trafficking of women is tacitly approved: The chained woman in Fengxian needn’t be rescued; the four girls in Tangshan cannot have their grievances redressed; sexual-harassment victims mustn’t be allowed to fight back; cases in which a woman does fight back against a male aggressor are deemed “mutual assault”; extramarital affairs, domestic violence, and even forced captivity do not constitute grounds for divorce. As long as it doesn’t affect the CCP’s overall allocation of “sexual resources” and its population-planning goals, the tragic suffering endured by countless women in China can be diminished, disregarded, or dismissed.
Therefore, from Fengxian to Tangshan, the CCP continues to vouch for offenders and deny justice for victims. The communist regime would rather leave 30 million single men to “buy” wives (a phenomenon created by its callous, decades-long one-child policy) than allow the awakening of Chinese women — purportedly the result of “infiltration by foreign forces” — to destabilize long-standing male dominance. This is what the CCP and its state media will say about Chinese women.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member