Could Sandra Fluke's candidacy cost Democrats Henry Waxman's seat?

Fluke has since moved to Los Angeles and become a “social-justice advocate.” Her limited time in the Golden State hasn’t stopped liberal activists such as DNC operative Hilary Rosen from promoting her candidacy, and Fluke says she is seriously considering a run. Even though several elected Democrats are lining up to run, name ID in the expensive L.A. market is everything and Fluke trumps almost all of her potential challengers in that category.

What worries some liberal strategists is this: Fluke rides her fame and her fundraising advantage with feminists into one of the two spots in the November runoff for the seat. The other slot is taken by Bill Bloomfield, a businessman who spent millions of his own money and held Henry Waxman to an eight-point victory in 2012 — a banner Democratic year in California. While both candidates would be newcomers, Bloomfield would have the money and name ID to be competitive.

Bloomfield told the Los Angeles Times last night that he is “leaning towards running” again and is taking a poll to gauge his chances. The district is winnable for an independent like Bloomfield, given that 28 percent of its voters are registered Republican and another 28 percent are independent or registered with minor parties.