Olbermann started the TV show segment with the proven lie that Andrew Breitbart was drunk, as if calling the Occupy movement ‘filthy animals’ isn’t the most sober assessment in the world. Then in rapid fire fashion, Olbermann pretended to ‘debunk’ every item on the list.

How? Olbermann does a few weird tricks here: One is that he decides to disqualify accusations if the assailant was homeless, even if the event happened at Occupy in an Occupy tent. Of course, the homeless are PART of Occupy. Not all are violent, of course. But if an assault happens AT Occupy, it’s an Occupy related assault — except in Olbermann’s world. Of course, there were many, like this one, committed not by a reported homeless person, but by actual identified, participating Occupiers.

In a couple of cases – Madison and Austin spring to mind — he just pretends that events which are obviously part of Occupy don’t relate to Occupy. It’s weird, but he does it.

So, here’s a point by point look at Olbermann’s debunking.