Friday's Final Word

AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

Time to close the tabs before final call for the weekend ... 

Advertisement

===

Less positive: She was vague to the point of vacuous. She struggled to give straight answers to her shifting positions on fracking and border security other than to say, “My values have not changed.” Fine, but she evaded the question of why it took the Biden administration more than three years to gain better control of the border, which it ultimately did through an executive order that could have been in place years earlier. It also didn’t answer the question of why she reversed her former policy positions — or whether she has higher values other than political expediency.

Harris also relied on a few talking points that may not serve her well in the next two months.

Ed: Bret Stephens is a master of understatement. "My values haven't changed" does not explain 180-degree policy flip-flops on nearly every issue from five years ago. Harris seems to not realize that the only believable reason for those reversals would be if her values HAD changed. Speaking of which ...

===

Ed: Yes, I ran this earlier today too, but the tab was still open!

===

“My overall take — can I tell you? Is that this is what happens when you have a meek person interviewed by a meek journalist — that’s what we saw. I don’t wish to personally offend her, but that’s what I saw. She didn’t have the stones to really press Kamala Harris and I think that’s because she knew Kamala Harris couldn’t take it,” Kelly continued. “So she went very gently with her and as a result we didn’t get Kamala Harris really pressed on any answers and we didn’t see her in any uncomfortable position — which is your job.”

Advertisement

Kelly continued to call out Bash by stating she “failed the profession and the country” as she’s been the only person to interview the potential next president of the United States.

Ed: I'm pretty much where Kelly is on this, too. Bash didn't go complete sycophant and did ask a couple of tough questions, but she also let Harris off the hook, too. And in the end, Harris didn't even take advantage of the openings Bash did leave her.

===

===

After watching Harris for a few of these pre-packaged segments, it is obvious that the weeks of bubble-wrap treatment insisted on by her team and supported by the mainstream media have not served her well.

One thing that is becoming clearer? Why Kamala’s team has been so disagreeable to the terms of the September 10 debate on ABC. I don’t think the live microphones or notes or podiums are the issue. The root cause of Team Harris’s hesitancy is something else entirely.

Ed: I'm not convinced that she will show up for the debate on September 10. 

===

Advertisement

===

At the 2020 vice presidential debate, Harris said, “Joe Biden will not ban fracking, he has been very clear about that I will repeat and the American people now that Joe Biden will not ban fracking.”

Dale said, “So it makes perfect sense that at the time she was speaking on behalf of Biden, the president, not the vice president, sets administration policy, but maybe other people feel differently. I certainly did not hear anywhere in there Kamala Harris saying she personally had abandoned her 2019 view rather she was speaking for Joe Biden.”

Ed: If a Republican flip-flopped on just one major policy, the media would eat them alive over it. They did with Mitt Romney on abortion, for instance, and they're doing it with abortion on Trump now for much less of a change. Harris has changed all of her previous positions, and all we get is chin-stroking from the same media outlets.

===

Advertisement

Ed: Case in point!

===

===

Walz was scarcely more impressive. When Bash asked about apparent false statements he has made about his military service, he guiltily replied that "my record speaks for itself" before meandering into a weird digression about how much he cares about school shootings. When Bash pressed him on the specific issue of whether he had made misstatements about having served in a war zone, Walz even less comfortingly replied that "my grammar is not always correct." His answers on his DUI arrest and family fertilization treatments were equally petty and evasive.

The baleful results are already trickling in. Betting odds on the presidential election's outcome shifted on Friday from a slight advantage for Harris to parity with Trump. The pollster Nate Silver shifted his forecast from a slight Harris lead in the electoral college results to a slight Trump lead. Harris' bounce in swing states seems to be receding. If Republicans want more movement in that direction, all they need to do is to keep Harris talking. She will almost certainly avoid that as much as possible, but American voters deserve to hear her.

Advertisement

===

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement