No matter how much you hate the media, you don't hate them enough.
One day, I want that saying to be false, but that day is certainly not today. In the wake of two terrorist attacks on America, the headline writers at our so-called "mainstream" media outlets outdid themselves, finding every which way in the book to downplay facts that are inconvenient to The Narrative™ and emphasize irrelevant facts that fit the one that they are feeding you.
The Cybertruck literally saved lives in Las Vegas today. The local police department confirmed it.
— Penny2x (@imPenny2x) January 2, 2025
Then the mainstream media writes headlines that make a terrorist attack look like Tesla’s fault.
This is dishonest and shameful.
We need a way to community note these authors. pic.twitter.com/yXhlrqZuia
People were rightly outraged when they woke up on New Year's Day to read that a "truck" killed and injured tens of people in New Orleans as if it drove itself.
As far as I know, Ford Lightning vehicles, whatever automation they may employ, do not drive around police car blockades, accelerate into crowds killing people and then eject robot drivers to have shootouts with police officers. That would a quite the programming bug.
And these trucks don't fly ISIS flags by themselves, either.
But from the headlines that splashed across America's newspapers, you might think they did.
BREAKING: Media headlines are misleading audiences, suggesting the Cybertruck caught fire or exploded due to a malfunction.
— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) January 2, 2025
The truth is that explosives were placed in the back and intentionally detonated, likely as part of a terrorist act. Don’t fall for the misinformation. pic.twitter.com/19f1jmtwxS
In some ways, the headlines about the car bombing attack on Trump's Las Vegas Hotel were even more deceptive, given that readers were actively misled into believing that the car explosion was a mechanical failure instead of an attempted mass murder. With the New Orleans headlines, readers could do the mental gymnastics, simple as they were, to figure out that a "truck" didn't kill those people, but a murderous terrorist did because human agency was obvious.
AP stands for Associated Propaganda pic.twitter.com/kh8rTuwlPK
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 2, 2025
But the Las Vegas headlines led you to believe that the Cybertruck involved in the attack literally did explode on its own since such events are plausible. Mechanical failures happen, although if you understand how electric vehicle batteries work, then you know that explosions are not their failure mode but rather rare but extremely difficult to extinguish fires.
Charred fireworks, gas canisters, and camping fuel were found in the bed of the Cybertruck that exploded outside of Donald Trump's hotel in Las Vegas. pic.twitter.com/M7BBseha5C
— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) January 2, 2025
Printing headlines describing the truck bombing as a "fire" or a truck "exploding" grossly distorts the reality, and it was a reality that anybody who knew much about lithium batteries and EVs immediately knew was not a mechanical failure.
Let me fix this headline for you, Washington Post. "Muslim Terrorist Wages Jihad in New Orleans." pic.twitter.com/QlwWWh3OTd
— toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) January 2, 2025
In other words, a Tesla Cybertruck didn't explode--somebody tried to blow it up. Ironically, if the vehicle hadn't been a Cybertruck, the damage would have almost certainly been much, much worse. The truck is built like a tank, and since the explosives were in the bed the force was directed almost entirely upward. The body of the truck remained intact, and most ironically of all the lithium batteries did NOT catch fire.
Actual in print NYT headline about Penny acquittal, in case you were wondering what a garbage newspaper is pic.twitter.com/c2P6NVEC06
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) December 10, 2024
In other words, visitors to the Trump Hotel were extremely lucky that the bomber, likely in an effort to make a political point against Trump and Musk, chose to rent a Cybertruck. Almost any other vehicle would have resulted in much more damage.
But that isn't the point the headline writer wanted to make. They wanted you to believe that Elon Musk built a dangerous vehicle that could spontaneously explode, and one did so ironically right outside a Trump hotel.
These sorts of misleading headlines happen all the time. And in many cases the very articles underneath them undermine or contradict the headlines.
But that doesn't matter, because most people only read the headlines or the first 100 or so words. The impression, not the full truth, is what they want people to be left with.
Headline: “Israel k*lls 5 journalists!”
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) December 26, 2024
Reality: “Oh wait the “journalists” were actually part of a t*rrorist organization”
Incredible stuff from the media pic.twitter.com/4sw61ukSBw
It's a powerful propaganda tool. There is so much information flying at us that we can only digest a tiny fraction of it, and headlines are by far the largest fraction of that tiny fraction.
There is so much power in so few words.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member