With deep sorrow and after great reflection, The New York Times has come to the unexpected conclusion that Donald Trump is unfit to lead America. 

This reversal of their longstanding support for President Trump and his policies will surely persuade the country that a man that both liberals and conservatives were united in supporting, despite some disagreements on policy issues. But as new information has come out in recent weeks and months--Russia Russia Russia, the pee tape, "fine people on both sides," and his plan to install himself as dictator for life--the Times is forced to tell us that the Editorial Board no longer thinks highly of the Orange Man. 

Donald Trump Is Unfit to Lead https://t.co/KtN7bhVi8N

— Morning Joe (@Morning_Joe) July 11, 2024

OMG, this is hilarious. 

The Times even tells us how much respect they have had for Republicans in the past. They loved how patriotic they were. 

No, really. Until Trump they backed us 110%!

The Republican Party once pursued electoral power in service to solutions for such problems, to building “the shining city on a hill,” as Ronald Reagan liked to say. Its vision of the United States — embodied in principled public servants like George H.W. Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney — was rooted in the values of freedom, sacrifice, individual responsibility and the common good. 

The Times loved loved LOVED John McCain and Mitt Romney. But Trump...sadly, they have concluded he is not a good man. 

"We are urging American voters to listen to Trump's words, to take him seriously, and to understand that this second presidency could be even more dangerous than the last."

— @MaraGay on why @nytimes' editorial board is calling "Donald Trump is unfit to lead" pic.twitter.com/iMR3kqFypu

— Morning Joe (@Morning_Joe) July 11, 2024

Donald Trump practically destroyed America when he was president. The wars, the inflation, the concentration camps.... Next time might be even worse! 

Mr. Trump has shown a character unworthy of the responsibilities of the presidency. He has demonstrated an utter lack of respect for the Constitution, the rule of law and the American people. Instead of a cogent vision for the country’s future, Mr. Trump is animated by a thirst for political power: to use the levers of government to advance his interests, satisfy his impulses and exact retribution against those who he thinks have wronged him.

He is, quite simply, unfit to lead.

Projection, thy name is New York Times. Joe Biden is selfless? They why is he clinging to power? The rule of law? Lawfare, you mean. Respect for the Constitution? Biden brags about snubbing the Supreme Court's decision on forgiving student loans and rails against the Court every chance he can. Not to mention the censorship, sending the FBI against parents and pro-lifers...

The Times offended some of their readers by criticizing President Biden, so they are throwing them a bone here. Nothing more. 

The idea that it is news, or even slightly noteworthy, that the Times Editorial Board hates the former president is laughable. Embarrassing. 

Pathetic. 

Election Day is less than four months away. The case against Mr. Trump is extensive, and this board urges Americans to perform a simple act of civic duty in an election year: Listen to what Mr. Trump is saying, pay attention to what he did as president and allow yourself to truly inhabit what he has promised to do if returned to office.

Voters frustrated by inflation and immigration or attracted by the force of Mr. Trump’s personality should pause and take note of his words and promises. They have little to do with unity and healing and a lot to do with making the divisions and anger in our society wider and more intense than they already are.

Yep. We have had so much harmony and healing under Biden, who has reached out his hand in peace to MAGA Republicans. 

Totally pathetic. 

But the graphics were nice. It wasn't just an editorial. It was practically a slideshow, slickly produced with terrifying black-and-white images and even subheadings. 

To call it propaganda, though, really underrates good propaganda. Not a single person who cares what The New York Times Editorial Board disagrees with a single thing doesn't already know what the Board thinks or will change their perspective in the slightest. 

And anybody else? They likely won't even expend the effort to shrug. What's the point? It is the same BS they sell every day prettied up to placate Democrats who believe the Times should kiss every dirty foot the party puts before them. They should eat the s**t sandwich, and since they rejected it, they must apologize. 

What a joke. A pathetic joke. 

Come up with some new material, man.