Hannity: Are you saying, Andrew, that there are more tapes?
Breitbart: Oh my goodness there are! Not only are there more tapes, it’s not just ACORN. And this message is to Attorney General Holder: I want you to know that we have more tapes, it’s not just ACORN, and we’re going to hold out until the next election cycle, or else if you want to do a clean investigation, we will give you the rest of what we have, we will comply with you, we will give you the documentation we have from countless ACORN whistleblowers who want to come forward but are fearful of this organization and the retribution that they fear that this is a dangerous organization. So if you get into an investigation, we will give you the tapes; if you don’t give us the tapes, we will revisit these tapes come election time.
Hannity: This is a blockbuster, what you’re saying here. You guys have more tapes, you’ll release them before the election, that could have a big impact on the election, obviously…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Registration is currently closed. That means if you're not already registered, you can't comment. We will let you know if and when registration re-opens. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
How about this instead:
cntrlfrk on November 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM
+1
I am really curious about what and who are on those tapes.
cibolo on November 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM
ACORN is DEAD! DEAD! DEAD!
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM
Interesting… but threatening to time release tapes to sway an election is not a smart thing to just go out an announce… even though it’s always done by the elite press… and Holder can always say that it is being investigated at the local level…
ninjapirate on November 20, 2009 at 9:20 AM
this man has balls. because the DOJ is powerful. they could make up some minor tax evasion charge & sic the IRS on him. his life would be bloody hell forever.
or the DOJ could plant child porn on Breitbart’s home computer & he would lose all credibility.
do you not think Eric Holder & Rahm Emmanuel are not capable of this?
kelley in virginia on November 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM
This is gonna get good. Pass the popcorn.
vcferlita on November 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM
I couldn’t believe it when he said it … I couldn’t believe that an American was attempting to “extort” the justice department to do it’s job.
But … it’s come to this. Americans have to have “leverage” over their own judicial system in order for it to function correctly.
If ACORN had been a Republican outfit – and one skinhead was discovered working in one office – you’d have seen the holy hell of Eric Holder’s justice delievered at the drop of a hat.
HondaV65 on November 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM
Smells like blackmail to me.
Of course, I think our Chicago administration knows the fragrance well….
cs89 on November 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM
Delicious. Did I say that?
Bishop on November 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM
Please have tapes of SEIU
Please have tapes of SEIU
Please have tapes of SEIU
Please have tapes of SEIU
nemecizer on November 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM
So you’re cool with blackmail?
My, how you’ve fallen off that moral high ground since a jihadi decided to shoot up an Army base.
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM
Now, now. No need to drag the FLOTUS into this.
Kent18 on November 20, 2009 at 9:27 AM
It’s sad that it’s come to this, but I am glad there are patriots like Breitbart out there.
bitsy on November 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM
I saw this last night, and I think it was a foolish move. Breitbart is holding a royal flush, why give them an idea of what he is up to? Frankly he should release some of the videos starting in May, just to squander the money collected by established candidates. If he is fortunate enough to force one to drop from an election he will have his vindication.
After tne May release, start realeasing videos around July to keep the candidates on the defensive.
Breitbart seems to be getting impatient that his videos aren’t receiving adaquate attention (rightly so), however if he waits until the election campains get into full swing he will do much more good, and will probably achieve all of his goals.
Rode Werk on November 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Oh man!!! I hope the kenyan and daley are involved.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM
Blackmail is generally a threat against a person’s reputation. Breitbart isn’t threatening Holder’s reputation, he’s threatening to release information that is not about Holder or Obama per se … unless Holder does what his job requires him to do. I don’t think this constitutes blackmail.
aunursa on November 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM
He didn’t mention blackmail at all, merely hoping (and in all likelyhood they do)that Brietbart has more tapes of these corrupt leftist institutions. What conservatives have known for years in now in blatantly obvious to the entire country through the work of two college kids with a camera. And the fact that you stooped so low to use the death of American service members to justify your flawed thinking is morally reprhensible, but hey, its not the first time the left has used soldiers to further their own agenda.
MyImamToldMeToDoIt on November 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM
Yes, yes, yes.
The problem is that the AG is on the side of ACORN. Holder needs to go. I do not trust him to not botch an investigation and hide/destroy evidence.
rbj on November 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM
Yes!
Breitbart is sharp, and fearless too. His star’s still rising, I think.
petefrt on November 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM
I saw this last night, and I think it was a foolish move. Breitbart is holding a royal flush, why give them an idea of what he is up to? Frankly he should release some of the videos starting in May, just to squander the money collected by established candidates. If he is fortunate enough to force one to drop from an election he will have his vindication.
“After tne May release, start realeasing videos around July to keep the candidates on the defensive.
Breitbart seems to be getting impatient that his videos aren’t receiving adaquate attention (rightly so), however if he waits until the election campains get into full swing he will do much more good, and will probably achieve all of his goals.
Rode Werk on November 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM”
I think Andrew knows just what he’s doin’.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM
By what stretch of definition is it blackmail?
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM
It’s not really blackmail unless what Breitbart has shows that Holder, himself, is dirty.
I hope he slams ACORN during the election cycle anyway. That should offset the cheating ACORN does, which might balance it into a fair election.
Daggett on November 20, 2009 at 9:33 AM
It’s not blackmail if you are just trying to get someone to do their job!
bitsy on November 20, 2009 at 9:36 AM
“So you’re cool with blackmail?”
What’s wrong with playing by the lefty rules?
They do it to us.
Brietbart’s got balls, I like balls.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 9:37 AM
If crimes were committed on the tapes, a la planning to smuggle in sex slaves, then it would be a crime to withhold them. It would make Breitbart et al accomplices.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:37 AM
Me too. My bet is he knows exactly how Holder will respond and he’s just setting him up. Andrew’s effective because usually he’s planned several moves ahead of the other players.
petefrt on November 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM
Delicious
faraway on November 20, 2009 at 9:39 AM
Ummm…there was no intention to actually bring in sex slaves.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM
He’s employing Alinsky tactics.
Heh heh.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM
BTW the “you’ve got balls, I like balls” is from Team America…before any of these trolls around here think I’m a lefty homo that likes balls in their face like them.
Just wanted to clear that up. Just in case.
Just say’n.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
An undercover lady cop doesn’t actually intend to, you know, but the guy paying for a, you know, doesn’t know that and is acting as if it is happening.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
It would appear that the problem within the DOJ is bigger than just one man. Removing Holder won’t solve much.
The DOJ needs to be reminded who they actually work for.
OldEnglish on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
“He’s employing Alinsky tactics.
Heh heh.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM”
Yep. Drop the gloves.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Inside thing. nemecizer was going out of his way right after the Ft. Hood shootings to defend Hasan, actually chastizing people for daring to call it a jihadist attack and pronounce him guilty before he had a fair trial. He was going after people for not calling him MAJ Hasan, because that’s a title you afford to everyone in the military, even radicals who kill other service members. At one point he proclaimed himself to be the ‘true conservative’ on the thread and he was comfortable occupying the ‘moral high ground’ while the rest of us were outraged over what had happened. He went after a military spouse, calling her something like disgraceful, for being emotionally upset and venting it in her comments.
So, no, I wasn’t using the death of American soldiers to justify anything.
And the ‘blackmail’ bit was taking Breitbart’s statement to its extreme definition to highlight nemecizer’s suddenly clouse moral compass. FWIW, I hope he gets Holder to investigate and punish ACORN, and then releases all the tapes right before the election anyway.
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Holder is part of the crime syndicate.
the_nile on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Thanks for policing that up for us.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM
Alinsky RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it…
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:43 AM
Yes, he is. And I loooooove it. Alinsky tactics when you’re lying leftist scum are effective. Alinsky tactics when you’re pointing out the truth are devastating.
Rational Thought on November 20, 2009 at 9:43 AM
My money is on Breitbart, Giles, O’Keefe are saving the best for last. Chicago, Chicago, that toddling town will show strong, intimate relationship with THE ONE & Co!
Herb on November 20, 2009 at 9:43 AM
Savor this thought for a moment.
We are witnessing the most corrupt administration in American history.
faraway on November 20, 2009 at 9:43 AM
ACORN is radioactive. Any Democrat still involved with them needs to seriously consider the ramifications of being associated with them.
This isn’t blackmail. It’s fair warning.
JammieWearingFool on November 20, 2009 at 9:44 AM
Holder could order Breitbart to produce the tapes tomorrow. Then issue him and everyone else involved a gag order, then never do anything about it.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:45 AM
Right…and?
The undercover cop is an accomplice?
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Breitbart 2012
WisCon on November 20, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Breitbart should file a writ of mandamus in federal court to force Holder to do his job.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:47 AM
“Holder could order Breitbart to produce the tapes tomorrow. Then issue him and everyone else involved a gag order, then never do anything about it.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:45 AM”
Andrew seems to me like the type that would sit in jail for a bit to make a point.
He’s the new breed kind we need.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 9:47 AM
I wouldn’t have offered Holder sh*t, except a promise that I’d continue releasing tapes when it suited me.
greggriffith on November 20, 2009 at 9:48 AM
Breitbart is screwing around with the machine here. He best be careful.
mizflame98 on November 20, 2009 at 9:48 AM
Only after an active investigation was ongoing and the pates may contain useful information in getting a conviction. Win Win for Breitbart imo.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:48 AM
Fixed
mizflame98 on November 20, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Agree, Andrew’s comments were really about Holder. Not ACORN.
faraway on November 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM
Uh, yeah, if she gives the guy a, you know, and takes the money and doesnt turn him in.
If you see a crime and don’t report it, you’re an accomplice. If Brietbart has evidence of crime on tape and doesn’t turn it in, he’s an accomplice.
Recently a gal snared her own husband by pretending to be an underage girl in some chat room. The guy got arrested. Had she not turned him in and the authorities got wind of what had occured,, I’m sure she could have been locked up for protecting a pedophile.
It ain’t rocket surgery, dood.
Akzed on November 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM
Which is what he could do anyway.
Keep pushing these people off balance.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM
Yep, you said that out loud.
cntrlfrk on November 20, 2009 at 9:50 AM
Hey Hanna, how YOU doing?
Seriously, she is SO freaking HOT. The fact that she’s a) conservative, b) intelligent and c) moral just makes me act all goofy.
MARRY ME WOMAN!
KMC1 on November 20, 2009 at 9:51 AM
That’s my hunch too. The expose’ will climax in Chicago.
petefrt on November 20, 2009 at 9:52 AM
Andrew the AG slayer.
John the Libertarian on November 20, 2009 at 9:53 AM
My bad, I was unaware of nemecizer’s ridiculous statements, I apologize
MyImamToldMeToDoIt on November 20, 2009 at 9:53 AM
You’re groping.
The crime was reported.
Thats why the nudge by Brietbart to get some action toward an investigation to the crime he reported.
Not that complicated. I think you know this, or when it come to basic logic, for you, that train has sailed.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Not a problem. I get mistaken for a lefty kind of often, actually.
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM
No.
Its not about Holder, its about an AG doing his or her job.
Do you think Brietbart has some dirt on Holder personally?
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Another thing that’s not smart is refusing to investigate crimes for political reasons. Guess we know which is more important to you.
Jim Treacher on November 20, 2009 at 9:59 AM
Yeah, it’s not blackmail—it’s leverage. Talking softly and carrying a big stick.
jdpaz on November 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM
A tape of him as the AG agreeing with his old Law Firm to try KSM in Federal criminal court so they can make beaucoup bucks?
Holger on November 20, 2009 at 10:01 AM
I think Breitbart knows that Holder will do the opposite of whatever Breitbart asks.
Daggett on November 20, 2009 at 10:02 AM
Holder will investigate Breitbart and the two kids.
Kill the Messenger.
Hopefully Breitbart has already handed the tapes to Beck for safekeeping and broadcast.
Holger on November 20, 2009 at 10:03 AM
Someone with some balls – go Andrew!
gophergirl on November 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Isn’t it funny that nobody is questioning why this threat affects only Democrats? I guess they’ve given up trying to cast ACORN as non-partisan, even though it’s illegal for them to be partisan.
Daggett on November 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM
I’d be willing to bet that investigation started a couple of months ago.
AScott on November 20, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Like someone else said…
CHI-CA-GO! CHI-CA-GO! CHI-CA-GO!! You know they went there.
Oh, please let there be SEIU on there! I want names, SERIOUS names.
Holder needs to go. Hell, BHO needs to go as well as Rahm.
Oink on November 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM
And the trolls said….
/crickets
CurtZHP on November 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM
This could get ugly for Andrew Breitbart, but I’m sure that he knows exactly what he’s walking into.
My hat’s off to you, Mr. Breitbart.
hillbillyjim on November 20, 2009 at 10:17 AM
I say, why not?
The NYT held off on an ACORN story until after the presidental election to benefit BHO. I tip my hat to Andy B. and the young investigators.
Go get ‘em, boys.
madmonkphotog on November 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM
I for one am absolutely cool with it. Especially when we’re talking about blackmail to get someone to do their friggin’ job. This is exactly the type of case the Federal AG is supposed to investigate and not doing so is a clear dereliction of duty.
Besides, this is really about Obama and any investigation by the AG would be a joke anyway. He’s already shown us several times that the Justice Department is now a purely political organization and has no intention of enforcing the law if it’s against their interests.
So, Breitbart might as well bring this out with a threat just to bring attention to a nationwide criminal conspiracy that is being ignored.
RadClown on November 20, 2009 at 10:22 AM
That would be nice, but I can’t think of a situation where the conversations inside of law offices being taped would happen.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 10:29 AM
When you are not being heard, maybe it helps to speak your opponents language. Sure, its not blackmail, but because its so close, they may actually understand the communication. Heh.
javamartini on November 20, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Do X or I will do Y is not blackmail.
commodore on November 20, 2009 at 10:43 AM
I wouldn’t trust Holder with the tapes… or with an investigation.
Forget about him. Holder IS ACORN.
mankai on November 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM
I was thinking about Bush’s “connection” to ENRON that the Left tried to stick on him merely because he knew Ken Lay.
Suddenly tumbleweeds are blowing through the MSM offices on Obama and his REAL ACORN connections.
mankai on November 20, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Dude. Sorry for sending the thread off on a ‘blackmail’ tangent. It’s not blackmail. I was just taking the definition of what Breitbart said to its most extreme to illustrate a point.
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Which is what?
Jim Treacher on November 20, 2009 at 10:54 AM
I never have figured out how a crime can be committed when non underage people impersonate underage people to entrap solicitors.
Seems to me that stuff like this isn’t actual pedophilia and is agenda driven to inflate the incidence of pedophilia.
wildcat84 on November 20, 2009 at 11:03 AM
What are you trying to say? Serious question. I can’t tell which view you hold.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Sad, really. We private citizens basically have to “blackmail” the Beltway crowd into doing their fricking jobs.
Although I’m sure that Holder, if he doesn’t just blow Breitbart off, will try to bluff Breitbart by SEEMING to start an investigation and then demanding that Breitbart turn over every second of audio and video he has.
Aitch748 on November 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM
What if he distributed the tapes to a third party unknown to the DOJ in advance? They could still release them, right?
Joe Caps on November 20, 2009 at 11:15 AM
release the tapes, that is…
Joe Caps on November 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Yer right it is extortion; sweet sweet extortion.
LincolntheHun on November 20, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Did you not get the memo about popcorn? It’s un-American.
Sharke on November 20, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Awesome.
Asher on November 20, 2009 at 11:19 AM
Oh no! This could really hurt ACORN”s reelection prospects!
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Only on HA, I’m sure.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 11:21 AM
I would define blackmail as the expectation to receive something tangible in exchange for withholding damaging information. Breitbart’s only expectation is that the DOJ will do its job and is offering them an ‘incentive’ to do so.
suzeecue on November 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM
How often are you mistaken for a human?
Jim Treacher on November 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Probably could, but an ongoing investigation would have to be going on. That being said, Brietbart would only have to release tapes with ACORN, and he implied there are other organizations. Things still seem to be in Americas favor.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM
Waaa…
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM
How often are you mistaken for humorous?
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 11:31 AM
It’s amusing that you guys have internalized, memorized and employed “Alinsky tactics” more than any liberal ever has. I’ve barely even heard of the guy outside of HA.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 11:33 AM
“It’s amusing that you guys have internalized, memorized and employed “Alinsky tactics” more than any liberal ever has. I’ve barely even heard of the guy outside of HA.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 11:33 AM”
Good point. All we need is someone with enough balls to employ them.
Brietbart’s one.
LtE126 on November 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM
And the rest of the media..MOST all of the media…totally ignores this story.
Absolutely Shameful.
bridgetown on November 20, 2009 at 11:38 AM
The guy has stones. I’d be afraid that my family would end up on the receiving end of a package from Ayers.
Chickyraptor on November 20, 2009 at 11:39 AM
This is hilarious. How do you figure this one?
Remember Harry Reid writing an official letter to Rush Limbaugh’s ‘boss’?
Remember Obama’s minions and Obama calling Fox News, ‘not real news’ ?
I could go on for days.
You’re just plain wrong.
bridgetown on November 20, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Thats because Alinsky considered you as one of his “useful” idiots. All you need to do is follow Obama’s talking points little man…just like you do every day. Thanks for playing.
javamartini on November 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM
P.S. ya dolt…Liberals don’t TELL you what they are doing, nor what they want to do. They lie.
Conservatives….many here at hotair…speak the truth.
Seems you can’t handle the truth, either.
bridgetown on November 20, 2009 at 11:41 AM
Far more often than you are recognized as intelligent.
Back under your bridge with your juicebox, dimwitted troll.
trfogey on November 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM
nemecizer is an ass. Ft. Hood thread. Start at page 23 and work from there.
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM
What are you basing that conclusion on? Is there some sort of data base or something?
I’m sure there are a lot of things you’ve never heard of. That is evidence of what?
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 11:46 AM
ACORN is just an innocent organization who helps poor people you crazy Rethuglicans.
– Simple343GrowBleedsBlue
angryed on November 20, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Holder: Yo! We’re doing an investigation over here. Gimmie the tapes. No, not copies, gimmie the originals.
Breitbart: Yay! Here ya go!
18 months later …
Breitbart: Say, Holder, what about that investigation?
Holder: Investigation? Oh, yeah, right, uhm, here’s a subpoena. You need to testify before a Grand Jury on you “investigation” techniques which probably broke a law someplace. And thanks for the tapes!
crosspatch on November 20, 2009 at 11:50 AM
I wouldn’t be surprised is Holder was gone in 18 months.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 11:55 AM
Agreed.
Breitbart, Giles, and O’Keefe are being true warriors here. They are sticking their necks waaaay out to support and defend the Constitution and the Republic. May we all be so dedicated.
Godspeed to them, and good hunting.
ZenDraken on November 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Holder dropped the voter intimidation case against the NBP. Holder has failed to look into ACORN scandal. Holder moves foreign enemy combatant KSM into American civilian justice system. Holder’s former law firm did pro bono for GITMO detainees. Holder is on the record decrying GITMO and the Military Tribunal System. There are new appointees in the DOJ who represented terrorists at GITMO. Seems that the AG and the DoJ have serious conflicts of interests that interfere with them carrying out their sworn duties.
muggedbyreality on November 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Breitbart is toast.
He can release tapes of Obama putting poison into his own mother’s tea, and nobody will care except us. We lose elections, so we have no power whatsoever, and everybody seems to know this except us.
The only thing that people care about is what the media is clobbering them with night and day.
The media colludes with the Obama Administration, and therefore colludes with ACORN, SEIU and very other Democrat front group. The media will have Breitbart behind bars before this ends.
Democrats own the world now, not us. They own the government, the media, academia, the courts, and now they even own Big Business. We own nothing.
jay12 on November 20, 2009 at 12:22 PM
This is absolutely golden. These three are like Deepthroat and Woodward & Bernstein.
If they’ve got a bunch of tapes, I’d space them out for release at every major Democratic moment: ObamaCare, cap & trade, card check…etc. Give the tapes to Fox and tie everything the Democrats do to ACORN.
It’s hardball time folks and these three are batting 3,4,5 in the order.
Line ‘em up and take ‘em out guys. Kudos.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM
How truthful, but it hurts.
Mirimichi on November 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Man I love Breitbart!
daesleeper on November 20, 2009 at 12:34 PM
That’s because you’re an idiot. Obama taught a class on it you fool. Hillary wrote her thesis on him you fool. Just because you’re a retard with his head up his ass doesn’t mean the rest of us are.
Your existence amuses me. Die in a fire you twit.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:35 PM
(sigh). Someone clean this up please.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM
I agree. It’s long past time you got cleaned up and cleaned out.
Sigh.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Good counter argument.
BadgerHawk on November 20, 2009 at 12:43 PM
So that’s a “never.”
Jim Treacher on November 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM
I’ve been here far longer than crr6 and he’s dumb as a box of rocks and mean too.
It’s typical that he can’t handle what he dishes out. Punks like him deserve nobody’s respect here or anywhere else.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:46 PM
+1. There is no purpose in continuing to allow him on here.
jay12 on November 20, 2009 at 12:48 PM
You’re right, I should have come up with a more substantive rejoinder to this…
I doubt that.
I’m afraid you lost the moral high ground after the whole “die in a fire” fiasco. Go back to your hole, lest I get you banned scumbag.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM
None whatsoever. His presence alone means a hijacked thread. I’ve watched this jerk hijack threads for what, over a year now and I just finally had enough.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:51 PM
Consider me emboldened by Andrew, Hannah and James’ courage. If HA wants to do it democratically, let’s have a poll to see if he goes.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM
It took you an hour to come up with that?
I’d say I’m disappointed, but…
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM
But you’re a stupid idiot.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:54 PM
Wonderful. You’re a modern-day Voltaire.
Are you by any chance related to Norman Blitzer?
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 12:57 PM
You LIE…
hillbillyjim on November 20, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Roll the dice dirtbag and we’ll see who wins that fight. I could care less about the ‘moral high ground’. You’re a jerk and a loser who contributes nothing but stupidity everywhere you post.
Unless you’ve been registered since the first open registration here more than three years ago, I’m quite certain I’ve been here longer.
Bring it.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Nothing more intellectual need be said about you. You don’t deserve it. Stupid idiot pretty much sums it up.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Exactly.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Yeah, I wonder who’ll win, the guy wishing death on a poster, or the poster he wished death upon. It’s a close one.
Don’t worry though dear, I won’t get you banned for now. You’re far too much fun : )
Yes, I know you’re a scumbag. You’ve made that abundantly clear. No need to clarify.
Oh, it’s already been BROUGHT!
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM
LOL nice. You really are the gift that keeps on giving.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 1:05 PM
Chump. Big mouth, no bite. You feel like compiling your greatest hits versus mine? G’head, I dare you.
Your claim on morality is more tenuous than Holder’s grasp on the law. I could care less about the moral high ground with you because you deserve nothing but contempt. You’re a pathetic troll. Period.
I love intellectual gunfights with the unarmed. I consider it target practice.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM
Diagram it stupid. Challenge my grammar. Just keep talking whatever you do. Nothing is more amusing than watching stupid people try to fight their way out of a paper bag.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:12 PM
LOL. No one would “compile your greatest hits” because no on gives a cr** about what you post. No one remembers anything you post. I don’t remember you posting before here nor do I care about anything you post.
You’re just another random wingnut adding trite drivel to the mindless choir of agreement. The only difference between you and anyone else here is that you happen to enjoy wishing death on people. Congratulations.
crr6 on November 20, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Gee I think you two should get a room
driver on November 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM
Yeh the folks here are just lining up to back you aren’t they. I made one obvious statement about what a moron you were and three posters jumped at the chance to back me up.
I don’t comment often, but I’ve been here since day 1. Check the archives.
And are you seriously going to tell me that people give a rat’s ass about what you say here? Are you kidding me? I think we just found someone more narcissistic than Obama. Congratulations yourself.
Trust me, nobody cares what you have to say because you have nothing to say.
Beat it.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM
I was having lunch with your mom. We still haven’t been able to narrow down the list of suspects as to your father.
Jim Treacher on November 20, 2009 at 1:28 PM
And there would be a lot more doing the same had this thread not mercifully dropped off the main page.
I agree with everything you said to “it”. EVERYTHING.
jay12 on November 20, 2009 at 1:29 PM
Hey crr6, maybe you can enlist Treach to help you with your crusade to ban me.
As for the identity of your father, my money’s on mentally challenged chimp.
Idiot.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM
Where y’at crr6? What happened to the tough guy? You hear a little girl Ace?
Good lookin’ out Jay. Don’t know what it was, but I just got tired of “it”.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 1:33 PM
Nah.
They’re failing and they know it. They function quite well when they are running the chessboard, but like most over confident blowhards, they will most likely make the mistakes they are making now only 10 fold and find themselves with a few pawns left for defense. In the last 6 months they have weakened greatly and I believe are on the verge of panic.
Itchee Dryback on November 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM
“It” seems to live on here, much like an useless, unwanted parasite.
jay12 on November 20, 2009 at 1:42 PM
I hope that you are correct, but their activities are so deeply rooted in corruption. They aren’t even phased by the $100 million Landrieu revelation, or so it seems.
jay12 on November 20, 2009 at 1:45 PM
It most certainly does.
russcote on November 20, 2009 at 2:04 PM