Gallant: 'No Choice But to Respond'

In an unsourced report, Channel 12 claimed the war cabinet decided to hit back “clearly and forcefully” against Iran with a response designed to send the message that Israel “will not allow an attack of that magnitude against it to pass without a reaction.”

Advertisement

The response would also be designed to make plain that Israel will not allow the Iranians to “establish the equation” they have sought to assert in recent days, the report said. This was an apparent reference to Iran’s warning that future Israeli strikes on Iranian territory, including its international diplomatic premises, will henceforth again be met by Iranian retaliatory strikes on Israel. ...

According to sources quoted in the Monday report, Gallant also told US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin that “Israel won’t accept an equation in which Iran responds with a direct attack every time Israel strikes targets in Syria.”

Ed Morrissey

Hmmm. We'll see what kind of attack they choose, but I would be surprised if they hit Iran directly. They may choose to attack Iranian positions in Syria -- the mention of that country seems like a signal -- as a way to keep Iran from launching another large-scale missile attack. I still believe they'd be better positioned strategically after concluding business in Rafah. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement