Soon.
What’s in a name…. again
Nah.
“If Obama is indeed in the mood for a final act of defiance toward these vandals…”
Sneak attack.
The stakes.
Reduction.
Surrender.
Wut.
Moving to elected justices may solve one serious problem but it simply creates another
“You want people who are tranquil of mind and can analyze the issues and come to a conclusion that makes sense…”
“I think it gives all pro-life leaders pause.”
“This tweet is so vile.”
Expect more of this to come
Lawless
What’s in a name?
Signed, sealed, but not delivered
… secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects…
Terrific.
The book of convenient exceptions
Here we go again…
Grilled.
The appearance…maybe but most would probably vote against Garland. Even then, why bother meeting with him?
Do over.
I’m sure he’ll be fine
He has a record and it should frighten you
“Just man up…”
Options.
Non-starter?
#NoHearingsNoVotes
Withholding consent.
“Do your job.”
Oh yes.
Even assuming that’s the reality…
Beyond politics.
Hmmm.
Cave?
Patience.
If the federal government had only been willing to follow the Constitution…
Vacancy.
Could hurt more than help.
Plenty of people are selling your name and you don’t even know it
I’m sure they have constitutions too…
Resistance.
Trending
“We’re just a family, now we have to take on the role of law enforcement…”
Rep. Jamaal Bowman of New York shared some thoughts on white supremacy on his Twitter account today. It turns out …
“Some lawmakers think she’ll never be able to run for leadership again.”