The Times doesn’t put it as bluntly as my headline does but that’s basically where this piece lands. Earlier this month I wrote about the situation in Oregon where, in a bid to reopen schools sooner, Governor Kate Brown moved teachers ahead of 65-year-olds in the vaccine line. But despite most teachers having received at least one shot by now, their unions continue to resist a return to classrooms. Even after the CDC announced guidelines for reopening schools without vaccinated teachers, the unions are still balking. That’s true not only in Oregon but in Washington and California as well. According to the Times there’s no clear reason for this except for the power of unions in deep blue states:

Marguerite Roza, a Georgetown University school finance expert based in Seattle, points out that Washington, Oregon and California “all have more left-leaning leadership that is cozier with the unions.” But Boston, Chicago and New York also have strong public employee unions.

Those Eastern cities also have mayoral control of the school systems. Elected school boards govern the districts on the West Coast, and in most, teachers’ unions are strong political players, particularly in major cities such as Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Also, Ms. Roza noted, anxiety can be habit-forming.

“Once you haven’t opened for this long, it gets harder and harder,” she said. “The surge may be over and the case counts may have dropped. But we’re not at a lower level of fear.”

Gov. Kate Brown, to her credit, is looking at what is happening to the kids stuck in this situation: “Eleven- and 12-year-olds were attempting suicide. And these were kids who had resources. What about the kids who don’t?” That’s the sort of thing that prompted her to move teachers toward the front of the line for the vaccine. But Portland union president Elizabeth Thiel is still complaining about ventilation, even though CDC guidelines said little more than open the windows.

Ms. Thiel said that the city’s aging school buildings had profoundly inadequate ventilation and that the city’s rate of infection was high by the new C.D.C. guidelines.

Though air circulation is an important safeguard in preventing the spread of the virus, the C.D.C. guidelines did not offer detailed recommendations other than suggesting schools open doors and windows — an omission noted by a number of urban labor leaders.

And now that we’re most of the way through the school year, Thiel is pushing to just give up on the rest of the year rather than try to do something.

“We hear concerns about teenagers’ mental health,” said Ms. Thiel, the Portland labor leader. “We hear kids need live interaction, and I agree. But does opening school with students in masks six feet apart, and the teacher behind a screen, and no lunch or recess — does that improve anything?”

She agrees kids are struggling at home but her response is that maybe reopening schools won’t matter? Does she have any basis for saying this? Is there any evidence at all that suggests reopening schools won’t be a positive for kids? Because everything I’ve seen points in the opposite direction, i.e. remote learning has been a disaster, especially for marginal students.

Thiel is quite literally throwing up her hands and suggesting it’s just better to give up than ask teachers to resume classes in person. Most people would be fired for this level of commitment to their career. Unfortunately, teacher’s unions that provide a lot of money to Democrats can get away with saying this stuff in public. Even NY Times readers (some of them teachers themselves) find this infuriating. From the comments left on this story:

All well said. If you took a vaccine before an elderly person, stop your whining and get back to the classroom.

The piece closes with one Portland parent who gets it: “No one can go back until everyone feels safe in the classroom. That’s not a way to make policy decisions that affect thousands of kids.” She’s right but unfortunately that’s exactly how these decisions are being made thanks to unions.