The merry little media war continues.
“primarily because the penalty for not having insurance would be eliminated.”
Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”
Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.
“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”
“Your Senator can slow the Senate down to a crawl…”
“One down, 216 to go”
Because keeping taxes in place is such a good idea. Not.
It’s really, really bad…
Shortsightedness at its worst.
“Too many of my constituents will lose insurance and there will be less funds to help the poor and elderly with their healthcare.”
One’s fine with no conviction, the other not so much
Donations for endorsements?
It’s all in the translation, you know.