https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2011/12/3...act-on-opposition-to-photo-id-voting-requirements/

They can't uphold the DoJ's interpretation without relying on Section 5, but overruling the DoJ on this would all but eviscerate that section -- and return the states under its aegis to the same voting-rights standards as every other state in the union, even if the Supreme Court doesn't explicitly end Section 5, which the 2009 case showed they seriously considered doing at the time. … South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley tells us she "will absolutely sue" Justice over its denial of her state's law and that challenge will go directly to federal district court in Washington, D.C. From there it may be appealed directly to the Supreme Court, which would have to consider whether South Carolina can be blocked from implementing a law identical to the one the High Court approved for Indiana, simply because South Carolina is a "covered" jurisdiction under the Voting Rights Act. … For a man who supposedly doesn't have the faintest clue what his own ATF is doing while bodies pile up in the hundreds in Mexico, thanks to Operation Fast and Furious, Eric Holder is rather busy sticking his nose into the business of states -- and perhaps spelling the end of disparate treatment by the Department of Justice of southern states entirely…