Jonathan Martin at Politico notices that we’re starting to see some familiar names around the White House these days, and not just because Barack Obama rehired a big chunk of the Clinton administration staff.  For those who didn’t get hired by Bill Clinton back in the day, a famous name can help get a slot in the executive branch.  The Obama administration protests that they have to be qualified, but apparently that includes having influential relatives in DC:

Need a job? Under President Barack Obama, as with presidents before him, it doesn’t hurt to have the right last name.

Obama’s promise of changing Washington hasn’t extended to banishing the age-old practice of giving plum posts to relatives of your top supporters — as he’s done with the relatives of a half-dozen well-connected Democrats.

Obama promised Hope and Change, and instead he’s delivering Chicago-sur-le-Beltway.  Whose relatives got their lucky break?  It’s a veritable Who’s Who of Democratic influence:

Instead of reforming government and “changing the way Washington does business,” President Obama has amplified the patronage system.  Martin notes that it’s not exactly Tammany Hall, and he’s right.  It does, however, keep more politicians personally beholden to Obama and reduce the independence of both the appointee and their more notable relatives in office.  Clearly, these are not just coincidental, but payoffs for political support.

Anyone with at least a passing familiarity with Chicago or Beltway politics will know that this is the same old nepotism, and anyone who has studied Obama’s rhetoric and actions knows it to be the same old hypocrisy on government reform.

Update: Add Lindsay Daschle at the Department of Agriculture.  The daughter of former Senator and erstwhile candidate for the HHS Cabinet position Tom Daschle works at Ag as the “Confidential Assistant to the Secretary”.  What the heck is a “Confidential Assistant”?  Is that a position that the Secretary can disavow if Ms. Daschle’s mission gets exposed?