<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/erika-johnsen/2013/08/27/sen-boxer-yeah-id-say-a-10hour-minimum-wage-sounds-about-right/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:41:54 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Sen. Boxer: Yeah, I'd say a $10/hour minimum wage sounds about right</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I&amp;#8217;ve shot down the stupidity of minimum-wage law idolization on Ed Schultz&amp;#8217;s MSNBC show before, but I merely wanted to draw attention to perfectly succinct and facepalm-worthy gem of a demonstration of progressives arbitrarily declaring a number that they deem &amp;#8220;fair&amp;#8221; to satisfy their minimum-wage whims, because how else could workers possibly be protected from the ostensible caprice of business owners and free-market signals? The real question, of course, is who is going to protect American workers from the &amp;#8216;unintended&amp;#8217; (but entirely predictable) consequences of top-down liberal vagaries? Via RCP:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:51:48 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erika Johnsen]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/erika-johnsen/2013/08/27/sen-boxer-yeah-id-say-a-10hour-minimum-wage-sounds-about-right-n209178</link></item></channel></rss>