<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2014/01/10/white-house-opposes-obamacare-transparency-as-administratively-burdensome/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:51:42 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>White House opposes ObamaCare transparency as "administratively burdensome"</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I don&amp;#8217;t have my Yiddish-English dictionary available, but this has to be the best example of chutzpah yet. The White House announced its opposition to bills under consideration in the House that would require HHS to start reporting weekly on their incompetent rollout of ObamaCare and especially the data integrity of the exchange.  The reason?  It&amp;#8217;s just too burdensome, the White House explains (via JWF and Instapundit):]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:21:22 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ed Morrissey]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2014/01/10/white-house-opposes-obamacare-transparency-as-administratively-burdensome-n186867</link></item></channel></rss>