<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/allahpundit/2015/12/04/loretta-lynch-we-will-prosecute-hateful-rhetoric-about-muslims-that-edges-towards-violence/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:05:07 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Loretta Lynch: We will prosecute hateful rhetoric about Muslims that "edges towards violence"</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Via BuzzFeed. To be honest, I&amp;#8217;m not sure my headline captures what she&amp;#8217;s saying. Watch the clip and ask yourself if she&amp;#8217;s talking about hateful acts or hateful speech. Not so clear, is it? She mentions speech and rhetoric and the First Amendment but she keeps coming back to prosecuting actions. If all she&amp;#8217;s saying is that she&amp;#8217;ll charge anyone who acts violently towards Muslims, that&amp;#8217;s not newsworthy. That&amp;#8217;s her doing her job. If what she&amp;#8217;s saying is that she&amp;#8217;ll charge anyone who speaks violently about Muslims, that&amp;#8217;s something else. She could have spoken perfectly clearly on this subject if she wanted to. The fact that she didn&amp;#8217;t means she intended to be vague. How come?]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:01:08 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/allahpundit/2015/12/04/loretta-lynch-we-will-prosecute-hateful-rhetoric-about-muslims-that-edges-towards-violence-n229307</link></item></channel></rss>