<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/allahpundit/2010/12/27/krauthammer-we-shouldnt-defund-obamacare/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:03:29 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Krauthammer: We shouldn’t defund ObamaCare</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Alternate headline: &amp;#8220;Confirmed: Krauthammer&amp;#8217;s a RINO.&amp;#8221;  Seriously, though, he&amp;#8217;s making a shrewd point about retail politics, especially given the left&amp;#8217;s desperate obsession with &amp;#8220;branding&amp;#8221; as the source of all of its problems.  No matter how expensive ObamaCare gets, no matter how many unintended consequences there are, they&amp;#8217;ll never admit that their signature domestic achievement is bad policy.  There&amp;#8217;ll always be an excuse, be it not enough Obama speeches on the subject or an insufficiently catchy name for the legislation (really!) or, inevitably, the idea that only by making the system more statist via a public option or single-payer will it truly thrive.  Krauthammer&amp;#8217;s point is that starving the beast will simply give them another excuse for its failure, so why not prop it up initially in the expectation that it&amp;#8217;ll fail? My addendum, which I&amp;#8217;ve suggested before: Since liberals were such fans of benchmarks for war funding, why not apply them to O-Care funding too?  Make them prove after the first few years that they really have bent the cost curve, that there&amp;#8217;s been no decline in quality of care, etc.  If they can&amp;#8217;t, the program is automatically defunded.  Remember their early predictions about how the stimulus would affect the unemployment rate?  This time, missing the target would mean something. As a sneak preview, here&amp;#8217;s something brand new today from WaPo.  I blame poor &amp;#8220;messaging&amp;#8221;:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:37:53 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/allahpundit/2010/12/27/krauthammer-we-shouldnt-defund-obamacare-n175522</link></item></channel></rss>