Nope.

“Just to keep it in perspective, I don’t think we should imagine that the conditions and the threat are exactly the same in the United States as they are in France,” he said. “They are different.”

“In fact, one thing that is different here is weapons are universally available and so, uh, it is actually a very good thing that…that…that the tensions are not exactly the same because we would expect to have a lot more of that sort of carnage here.”

Weapons are universally available in the U.S. you see, unlike France. So, things might have gone down a much darker, more destructive path had they happened here?

But in France, despite tight gun control, the terrorists had automatic weapons.

Despite stringent firearms controls and ramped-up efforts to combat illegal gun trafficking, thousands of “war weapons” remain strewn across the European Union’s 28 member states. Many, like the AK-47 assault rifles used by the gunmen who attacked the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris on Wednesday, are bought by gun collectors, organized crime affiliates and, as was the case this week, terrorists.

And, it was the initial police response without, which is partly why the perpetrators were able to escape. You’d think there might be a lesson there, but no.