The second in what’s suddenly become a continuing series. One of the few tough things about blogging every day is that you wind up repeating yourself, so instead of me rehashing the myriad aspects of her phoniness, just shoot on over here and refamiliarize yourself with the checklist to which is now added her exceedingly nuanced approach to using nukes against Iran. We’re a little closer to the general election now than we were when she was first asked about this so she’s going to get her hawk on by feigning indignation that Obama would take the biggest option in the U.S. arsenal off the table. Somewhere Buzz Patterson is smiling.
Anyway, just flagging this. I’m sure we’ll be hearing on O’Reilly next Monday at around 8:40 or so how this really isn’t a big deal and she really doesn’t want to take nukes off the table and the nutroots really aren’t all that bad, etc etc etc.
Update: Meanwhile, don’t look now but Silky’s on his way towards the exit.
Update: Captain Ed predicts Hillary’s excuse: she only wants nukes off the table with respect to actual enemies who exist whereas Obama wants them off the table even hypothetically. There’s the difference between a Democratic hawk and dove.
Update: More tough, nuanced questions for the Democratic field.