<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:31:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo on reforming food aid: Time to end the special-interest hostage-taking</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/wapo-on-reforming-food-aid-time-to-end-the-special-interest-hostage-taking/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/wapo-on-reforming-food-aid-time-to-end-the-special-interest-hostage-taking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Efficiency.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/wapo-on-reforming-food-aid-time-to-end-the-special-interest-hostage-taking/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-shot-2013-05-13-at-4.30.58-PM-e1368477198172.png" /></a></p><p>Efficiency.</p>
<hr /><p>The Obama administration is once again reviving a years-long and recurring effort to reform the way the United States delivers food aid abroad, but unfortunately, it&#8217;s a very uphill battle against some highly specially interested parties and the Congresspeople who represent them. Right now, the federal government spends just shy of a couple billion dollars [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/wapo-on-reforming-food-aid-time-to-end-the-special-interest-hostage-taking/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/wapo-on-reforming-food-aid-time-to-end-the-special-interest-hostage-taking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo has drastic change of heart about traditional filibuster after Sen. Rand Paul actually does one</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/08/wapo-has-drastic-change-of-heart-about-traditional-filibuster-after-sen-rand-paul-actually-does-one/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/08/wapo-has-drastic-change-of-heart-about-traditional-filibuster-after-sen-rand-paul-actually-does-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=248528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hostages.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/08/wapo-has-drastic-change-of-heart-about-traditional-filibuster-after-sen-rand-paul-actually-does-one/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Corrections.jpg" /></a></p><p>Hostages.</p>
<hr /><p>The Washington Post editorial board, Jan. 16, 2013: The editorial is entitled, &#8220;Progress in the Senate,&#8221; and praises tweaks made to Senate filibuster rules by Sens. Reid and McConnell while also noting the need for further reform. Among reform options, making senators who wish to filibuster actually perform a traditional, talking filibuster: The Senate’s leaders [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/08/wapo-has-drastic-change-of-heart-about-traditional-filibuster-after-sen-rand-paul-actually-does-one/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/08/wapo-has-drastic-change-of-heart-about-traditional-filibuster-after-sen-rand-paul-actually-does-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: CBS &#8220;can confirm&#8221; FBI probing Menendez for prostitution claims</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/video-cbs-can-confirm-fbi-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/video-cbs-can-confirm-fbi-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominican Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Menendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salomon Melgen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Pressure is growing..."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/video-cbs-can-confirm-fbi-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-claims/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/cbs-menendez.jpg" /></a></p><p>"Pressure is growing..."</p>
<hr /><p>On Saturday, a CBS News website article merely pointed to a Washington Post report on the FBI probe of Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) expanding to include allegations of engaging in prostitution.  Today on CBS This Morning, the story gets the full video treatment, including an independent confirmation of the Post&#8217;s reporting. Jan Crawford reports that [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/video-cbs-can-confirm-fbi-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-claims/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/video-cbs-can-confirm-fbi-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo reports FBI probing Menendez for prostitution allegations</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/16/fbi-now-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-allegations/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/16/fbi-now-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-allegations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Menendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting toxic?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/16/fbi-now-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-allegations/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/menendez-glum.jpg" /></a></p><p>Getting toxic?</p>
<hr /><p>It started off as a sex scandal, and it&#8217;s coming back around again.  The Washington Post reported last night that the FBI has expanded its probe of Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) beyond the interventions on behalf of big donor Salomon Melgen and his business interests, and into allegations that Menendez frequented prostitutes while traveling with [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/16/fbi-now-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-allegations/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/16/fbi-now-probing-menendez-for-prostitution-allegations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo editors, Senate Dems not terribly keen on Hagel for SecDef, either</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/wapo-editors-senate-dems-not-terribly-keen-on-hagel-for-secdef-either/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/wapo-editors-senate-dems-not-terribly-keen-on-hagel-for-secdef-either/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The political pinch.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/wapo-editors-senate-dems-not-terribly-keen-on-hagel-for-secdef-either/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/hagel-pinch.jpg" /></a></p><p>The political pinch.</p>
<hr /><p>So far, the trial balloon coming out of the White House to replace Leon Panetta with Chuck Hagel seems to be losing steam.  It came under immediate criticism not from Barack Obama&#8217;s Republican opponents but from prominent Jewish Democrats at a presidential Hanukah party.  Yesterday, the Weekly Standard reported on statements from Senate Democrats looking [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/wapo-editors-senate-dems-not-terribly-keen-on-hagel-for-secdef-either/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/19/wapo-editors-senate-dems-not-terribly-keen-on-hagel-for-secdef-either/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo editors: Golly, Obama&#8217;s fiscal-cliff approach is unbalanced</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/wapo-editors-golly-obamas-fiscal-cliff-approach-is-unbalanced/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/wapo-editors-golly-obamas-fiscal-cliff-approach-is-unbalanced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced approach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=234666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In more ways than one.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/wapo-editors-golly-obamas-fiscal-cliff-approach-is-unbalanced/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/unbalanced.jpg" /></a></p><p>In more ways than one.</p>
<hr /><p>Barack Obama keeps claiming that he wants a &#8220;balanced&#8221; approach to deficit reform, but the editors of the Washington Post have a little difficulty trying to figure out what he means by &#8220;balanced&#8221; &#8212; since his proposals have had a 4:1 ratio of tax hikes to spending cuts.  The Post also notes that Obama has [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/wapo-editors-golly-obamas-fiscal-cliff-approach-is-unbalanced/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/wapo-editors-golly-obamas-fiscal-cliff-approach-is-unbalanced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise: investors shifting resources to avoid tax hikes next year</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/11/surprise-investors-shifting-resources-to-avoid-tax-hikes-next-year/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/11/surprise-investors-shifting-resources-to-avoid-tax-hikes-next-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic tax analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Stagnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static tax analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax hikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=234048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Static vs dynamic analysis.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/11/surprise-investors-shifting-resources-to-avoid-tax-hikes-next-year/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/o-facepalm3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Static vs dynamic analysis.</p>
<hr /><p>Remember the difference between static and dynamic tax analysis?  The former posits that tax changes produces no change in market behavior, so that hiking taxes by 10% gets you 10% more in revenue.  The latter assumes that changes in tax codes forces markets to adapt, so that rate hikes risk lowering revenues, and lowering rates [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/11/surprise-investors-shifting-resources-to-avoid-tax-hikes-next-year/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/11/surprise-investors-shifting-resources-to-avoid-tax-hikes-next-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled NYT questions leadership change at the WaPo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/19/embattled-nyt-questions-leadership-change-at-the-wapo/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/19/embattled-nyt-questions-leadership-change-at-the-wapo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=230948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glass house?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/19/embattled-nyt-questions-leadership-change-at-the-wapo/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/nyt-building.jpg" /></a></p><p>Glass house?</p>
<hr /><p>It&#8217;s not too often that one sees a major newspaper attacking another in a different market.  In today&#8217;s New York Times, though, media critic David Carr criticizes the management at the Washington Post in both the manner and substance of their change at the top of the editorial structure.  In doing so, Carr uses anonymous [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/19/embattled-nyt-questions-leadership-change-at-the-wapo/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/19/embattled-nyt-questions-leadership-change-at-the-wapo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo: Sensitive intel documents still lying on the floor of looted Benghazi consulate</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/03/wapo-sensitive-intel-documents-still-lying-on-the-floor-of-looted-benghazi-consulate/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/03/wapo-sensitive-intel-documents-still-lying-on-the-floor-of-looted-benghazi-consulate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ambassador Chris Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=221692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/03/wapo-sensitive-intel-documents-still-lying-on-the-floor-of-looted-benghazi-consulate/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-h1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Security.</p>
<hr /><p>Something else to add to your list of things that Darrell Issa is supposed to reserve judgment about until after the election. Among the information contained in these docs: The names of Libyan security contractors who protected the embassy and whose lives are, as you might expect, now in grave danger. But that&#8217;s not the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/03/wapo-sensitive-intel-documents-still-lying-on-the-floor-of-looted-benghazi-consulate/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/03/wapo-sensitive-intel-documents-still-lying-on-the-floor-of-looted-benghazi-consulate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo ombud: Say, there aren&#8217;t many conservatives in our &#8220;news&#8221; section, huh?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/29/wapo-ombud-say-there-arent-many-conservatives-in-our-news-section-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/29/wapo-ombud-say-there-arent-many-conservatives-in-our-news-section-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=220890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No kidding.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/29/wapo-ombud-say-there-arent-many-conservatives-in-our-news-section-huh/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/home-alone.jpg" /></a></p><p>No kidding.</p>
<hr /><p>Distrust of the national news media continues to grow, pollsters such as Gallup and Pew report, and yet we don&#8217;t see too much introspection on the part of these media outlets.  New York Times public editor Arthur Brisbane concluded that the newspaper suffered from institutional bias to the point where it has become a &#8220;progressive [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/29/wapo-ombud-say-there-arent-many-conservatives-in-our-news-section-huh/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/29/wapo-ombud-say-there-arent-many-conservatives-in-our-news-section-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo/ABC poll: Obama&#8217;s favorable rating now underwater &#8212; including with women</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favorable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/o-face.jpg" /></a></p><p>Oh my.</p>
<hr /><p>B-b-b-but Madeleine Albright says she can&#8217;t understand why any woman would vote for Mitt Romney. Seriously, guys, I want to believe. I do. But &#8230; I don&#8217;t. Yet. Just 47 percent of registered voters in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll see Obama favorably overall, down 7 percentage points from his recent peak in April, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/wapoabc-poll-obamas-favorable-rating-now-underwater-including-with-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact checking in the hot tub time machine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/30/fact-checking-in-the-hot-tub-time-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/30/fact-checking-in-the-hot-tub-time-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=215730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back to the future!]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/30/fact-checking-in-the-hot-tub-time-machine/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/politifact-pof.jpg" /></a></p><p>Back to the future!</p>
<hr /><p>The always accurate and never disputed people at Wikipedia tell us that &#8220;fact checking&#8221; has been around since the early 20th century. &#8220;By the 1930s a fact checking department became a symbol of establishment among publications.&#8221; Even with the number of outrageous abuses of the practice in recent months, it still seemed to be a [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/30/fact-checking-in-the-hot-tub-time-machine/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/30/fact-checking-in-the-hot-tub-time-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh my: Romney/Ryan lead on Medicare in Florida and Ohio?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/23/oh-my-romneyryan-lead-on-medicare-in-florida-and-ohio/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/23/oh-my-romneyryan-lead-on-medicare-in-florida-and-ohio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=214207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boomerang.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/23/oh-my-romneyryan-lead-on-medicare-in-florida-and-ohio/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/pr10.jpg" /></a></p><p>Boomerang.</p>
<hr /><p>An important addendum to Ed&#8217;s CBS/NYT number-crunch from lefty Greg Sargent: The breakdown sent over by CBS: * In Florida, 48 percent of seniors say Romney would do a better job on Medicare, versus 44 percent who say that about Obama (the Ryan pick was supposed to be particularly problematic in this state). * In [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/23/oh-my-romneyryan-lead-on-medicare-in-florida-and-ohio/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/23/oh-my-romneyryan-lead-on-medicare-in-florida-and-ohio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo fact checker gives 4 Pinocchios to Harry Reid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/07/wapo-fact-checker-gives-4-pinocchios-to-harry-reid/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/07/wapo-fact-checker-gives-4-pinocchios-to-harry-reid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cronyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=210807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, Part III of Questions Harry Reid Won't Answer.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/07/wapo-fact-checker-gives-4-pinocchios-to-harry-reid/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/ramirez-reid-tn.jpg" /></a></p><p>Plus, Part III of Questions Harry Reid Won't Answer.</p>
<hr /><p>You&#8217;re probably asking yourself, &#8220;Only four?&#8221;  That&#8217;s as high as the scale goes for Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler, who takes a rather dispassionate view of the McCarthyite tactics of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, one of the highest-ranking Democrats in government.  Instead of ripping Reid for his ethics, Kessler tries to reverse-engineer Mitt Romney&#8217;s [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/07/wapo-fact-checker-gives-4-pinocchios-to-harry-reid/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/07/wapo-fact-checker-gives-4-pinocchios-to-harry-reid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Obama peaked?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/10/has-obama-peaked/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/10/has-obama-peaked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conn carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=205830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Downhill?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/10/has-obama-peaked/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Downhill?</p>
<hr /><p>Conn Carroll&#8217;s post is kryptonite to an eeyore, but I owe you guys some sunshine after yesterday&#8217;s raincloud about Romney&#8217;s chances after the debates. Note the big &#8220;if&#8221; built in here. Worse for Obama, the latest fundraising numbers show he will not be able to outspend Romney forever. Romney and the Republican National Committee raised [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/10/has-obama-peaked/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/10/has-obama-peaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems: At Bain, Romney was a &#8220;pioneer&#8221; in outsourcing jobs overseas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/22/dems-at-bain-romney-was-a-pioneer-in-outsourcing-jobs-overseas/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/22/dems-at-bain-romney-was-a-pioneer-in-outsourcing-jobs-overseas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bain Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=202599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So... what's your point, exactly?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/22/dems-at-bain-romney-was-a-pioneer-in-outsourcing-jobs-overseas/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/romney-betteramerica.jpg" /></a></p><p>So... what's your point, exactly?</p>
<hr /><p>Ughh. It sickens me that our country&#8217;s leaders are thusly engaged in such damaging, cheap populism. The Washington Post just wheeled out a new report, detailing how &#8220;Romney&#8217;s Bain Capital invested in companies that moved jobs overseas.&#8221; Am I imagining it, or is anybody else detecting a gentle hint that we&#8217;re supposed to believe that [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/22/dems-at-bain-romney-was-a-pioneer-in-outsourcing-jobs-overseas/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/22/dems-at-bain-romney-was-a-pioneer-in-outsourcing-jobs-overseas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>273</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polls: Independents starting to bail on Obama over the economy?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/13/polls-independents-starting-to-bail-on-obama-over-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/13/polls-independents-starting-to-bail-on-obama-over-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=200875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/13/polls-independents-starting-to-bail-on-obama-over-the-economy/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Data.</p>
<hr /><p>Tomorrow&#8217;s the big speech where he plans to ask for more time to turn things around because there have been all sorts of headwinds and Hopenchange takes time and that damned George W. Bush did everything wrong and yadda yadda yadda. Think indies will go for it after this month&#8217;s terrible jobs report? New from [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/13/polls-independents-starting-to-bail-on-obama-over-the-economy/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/13/polls-independents-starting-to-bail-on-obama-over-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do WaPo editors read their own newspaper?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/do-wapo-editors-read-their-own-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/do-wapo-editors-read-their-own-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Kessler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politifact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=198004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pinocchios and projection.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/do-wapo-editors-read-their-own-newspaper/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/EugeneRobinsonSquirms.jpg" /></a></p><p>Pinocchios and projection.</p>
<hr /><p>Newspapers and other media sources insist that their mission is to keep Americans well-informed and cognizant of the facts.  Those tasks fall to editors, who are supposed to exercise discretion and judgment on articles that appear in their publication.  The Washington Post even employs a well-read fact checker, Glenn Kessler, who receives both praise and [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/do-wapo-editors-read-their-own-newspaper/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/do-wapo-editors-read-their-own-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Opposition to gay marriage drops to new low after Obama&#8217;s announcement</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/23/poll-opposition-to-gay-marriage-drops-to-new-low-after-obamas-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/23/poll-opposition-to-gay-marriage-drops-to-new-low-after-obamas-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=197316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmmm.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/23/poll-opposition-to-gay-marriage-drops-to-new-low-after-obamas-announcement/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/o-e.jpg" /></a></p><p>Hmmmm.</p>
<hr /><p>Does The One still have this sort of influence even among his base? C&#8217;mon. I know he&#8217;s &#8220;the Lightbringer&#8221; or whatever, but no one&#8217;s morals are changing overnight just because Obama finally mustered the meager political courage needed to drop his ancient charade on SSM. Or are they? Overall, 53 percent of Americans say gay [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/23/poll-opposition-to-gay-marriage-drops-to-new-low-after-obamas-announcement/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/23/poll-opposition-to-gay-marriage-drops-to-new-low-after-obamas-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>181</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/13/quotes-of-the-day-1025/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/13/quotes-of-the-day-1025/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cranbrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lauber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vandersloot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=195761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bullies.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/13/quotes-of-the-day-1025/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/o-grim2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Bullies.</p>
<hr /><p>A top Democrat on Sunday defended Mitt Romney&#8217;s character, saying that despite recent reports that Romney was a bully as a young man attending prep school, he believes that has little to do with the man Romney is today. &#8220;There&#8217;s not a single thing that I know about Mitt Romney in his adult life which [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/13/quotes-of-the-day-1025/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/13/quotes-of-the-day-1025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>296</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family of alleged Romney victim angry over exploitation of story</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/11/family-of-alleged-romney-victim-angry-over-exploitation-of-story/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/11/family-of-alleged-romney-victim-angry-over-exploitation-of-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=195461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over to you, WaPo.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/11/family-of-alleged-romney-victim-angry-over-exploitation-of-story/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/picard-facepalm.jpg" /></a></p><p>Over to you, WaPo.</p>
<hr /><p>The family of the eight-years-deceased alleged victim of a cruel prank by a teenaged Mitt Romney reacted angrily to the Washington Post story yesterday &#8212; but not for the reasons one might imagine.  Calling the Washington Post story &#8220;factually inaccurate,&#8221; the sisters of the late John Lauber lashed out at the Post for using him [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/11/family-of-alleged-romney-victim-angry-over-exploitation-of-story/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/11/family-of-alleged-romney-victim-angry-over-exploitation-of-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>227</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo: We really didn&#8217;t want that story about Obamacare adding to the deficit to go viral</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/17/wapo-we-really-didnt-want-that-story-about-obamacare-adding-to-the-deficit-to-go-viral/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/17/wapo-we-really-didnt-want-that-story-about-obamacare-adding-to-the-deficit-to-go-viral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Korbe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=190698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Candor.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/17/wapo-we-really-didnt-want-that-story-about-obamacare-adding-to-the-deficit-to-go-viral/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/WaPo.jpg" /></a></p><p>Candor.</p>
<hr /><p>Washington Post ombudsman Patrick Pexton recently defended the WaPo&#8217;s decision to run a major story on page A3, rather than the front page. The story &#8212; which revealed that Obamacare will actually add to the deficit rather than subtract from it, as the administration has claimed since before the passage of the massive health care [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/17/wapo-we-really-didnt-want-that-story-about-obamacare-adding-to-the-deficit-to-go-viral/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/17/wapo-we-really-didnt-want-that-story-about-obamacare-adding-to-the-deficit-to-go-viral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh my: Majorities of liberal Democrats now support drone strikes, keeping Gitmo open</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/08/oh-my-majorities-of-liberal-democrats-now-support-drone-strikes-keeping-gitmo-open/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/08/oh-my-majorities-of-liberal-democrats-now-support-drone-strikes-keeping-gitmo-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=178982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Change.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/08/oh-my-majorities-of-liberal-democrats-now-support-drone-strikes-keeping-gitmo-open/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ob.jpg" /></a></p><p>Change.</p>
<hr /><p>Pity poor Glenn Greenwald, who thought the left&#8217;s opposition to Bush&#8217;s counterterror policies was based on something more profound than crude partisan tribalism. Why he thought that, I don&#8217;t know: The writing was on the wall when the anti-war movement started dying even as Obama geared up for a surge of tens of thousands of [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/08/oh-my-majorities-of-liberal-democrats-now-support-drone-strikes-keeping-gitmo-open/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/08/oh-my-majorities-of-liberal-democrats-now-support-drone-strikes-keeping-gitmo-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>194</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eugene Robinson squirms through apology to Rick Santorum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/06/eugene-robinson-squirms-through-apology-to-rick-santorum/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/06/eugene-robinson-squirms-through-apology-to-rick-santorum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=173303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I wish I hadn't said it that way..."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/06/eugene-robinson-squirms-through-apology-to-rick-santorum/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/EugeneRobinsonSquirms.jpg" /></a></p><p>"I wish I hadn't said it that way..."</p>
<hr /><p>Allapundit covered this story after it first broke, and the entire thing looked like a slow motion train wreck from the beginning. During an appearance on MSNBC&#8217;s Rachel Maddow show, Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson broke out some jaw dropping comments regarding a story about Rick Santorum and his family following the death of one [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/06/eugene-robinson-squirms-through-apology-to-rick-santorum/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/06/eugene-robinson-squirms-through-apology-to-rick-santorum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>352</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>