None of you are exactly winning the Miss Congeniality award
WSJ: “Would eschew many of the free-market principles that have guided prior Republican administrations.”
“The presidential stakes are too high for Mr. Trump to let his family business become a daily political target.”
That was certainly convenient, particularly if you happened to be pondering a presidential bid
“there was concern the Iranians probably did consider it a ransom payment…”
“In the future I will be more circumspect.”
“Her fellow Justices need to stage an intervention…”
You might want to take this call
Nothing to see here.
“The Obama crowd too often responds to critics and to world affairs like self-absorbed adolescents.”
“These are profound changes.”
Romney up 2 in gender gap.
Margin of error.
“[T]he numbers in the NBC/WSJ poll bear a striking resemblance to those from 2004…”
“Live Free or Die”
“Obama’s chances for re-election … are no better than 50-50.”
Not actually “subsidies” and not unique
“Can you imagine what’s on Osama bin Laden’s hard drive?”
Nostalgie de la Paul.
The Muddle Continues
NYT columnist: ACLU needs social-justice definition of free speech.