“law enforcement was standing passively by, seeming to be waiting for violence to take place…”
At least their address rarely changes
“…won’t participate in the state’s individual market…in 2018.”
“…it is no longer likely that plaintiffs can succeed on their claim that the predominate purpose of EO-2 is to discriminate against Muslims”
Pretty much without comment
“It’s always good to mix things up.”
A resolution? Possibly, but not a sure thing
It’s a cheap gun sale. Come one, come all
Business as usual.
Will they rule on “gender” or simply government policy?
“The person I had talked to was not the person I was familiar with from my story.”
If these reports are true…
Campaign chairman is let go after holding a protest in support of Trump?
“We have a tremendous working relationship with the RNC.”
With only eight seats filled, the Supremes could simply pass on the issue
“It is time to move on.”
Kaine not able?
Yesterday… all our opinions seem so far away…
What about the veteran vote?
Overruled “as a courtesy”
This is a power which does not exist
“Correll pleads under oath that he ‘believes that Donald Trump is unfit to serve as President of the United States…'”
In the clear
The quo needs a quid.
A one-two punch?
High bars or not at all.
Take the poll!
Locking-up the felon vote.
When you point something that looks like a gun at the cops…
Not a sweep, but a majority
NYT columnist: ACLU needs social-justice definition of free speech.