Gas attacks? No, we’re feeling fine, thank you.
Here we go.
“…part of an immediate review of all intelligence in the hours after the attack”
Attack claims “100% fabrication.”
“I said it was obsolete. It’s no longer obsolete.”
“…the runway is of idle military interest.”
Just asking questions.
“The dossier refutes the Russian claim that the attack was on an opposition-held chemical weapons depot.”
“This distinction does not much matter to the dead …”
“the presence of the surveillance drone over the hospital couldn’t have been a coincidence…”
“It’s a complete indictment of Obama.”
Trump approval: 43/49.
101,300 gross tons of persuasion.
CNN also tried to bait him into slamming Trump…it turned out poorly.
Regime change: Yes or no?
Could have been worse
“A US defense official says intelligence shows a Russian drone flew over the hospital in Idlib that was treating victims of the chemical attack…”
“America is back.”
“There’s only a few of us here who still believe in the Constitution.”
“I think a lot of Trump voters will be really scratching their heads hard and asking, ‘Where does this go from here?'”
“…let’s think about the possible reasons for Russia’s failure.”
“Not only does he have right, he has an obligation to act.”
“Leaders across Western Europe, as well as anti-terrorist allies Saudi Arabia and Turkey, welcomed the attack…”
“This beginning had to happen.”
Europe (mostly) cheers.
“With the acts that he has taken, it would seem that there would be no role for him to govern the Syrian people.”
“unconditional support is not possible in this current world”
“set the Middle East ablaze.”
“There’s a gift shop that sells standard museum trinkets…”