“Captured on the battlefield”?
What could go wrong?
It’s come to this.
What else are they hiding?
“To underscore that these protests are rooted in and Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”
Susan Rice dispatched.
“It is a kind of, ‘Uh-huh, what did I tell you?’”
“FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.”
No effort to downplay terrorism.
Media turning on Rice?
“Very messy and hot, and not helpful.”
“Certainly, she misled the American public.”
“Clearly, the information given to the American people was wrong. In fact, Amb. Rice said today, ‘Absolutely, it was wrong.'”
Is it, though?
“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points.”
Plus, maybe the Secretary of State shouldn’t be a dupe.
Rice’s talking points “came from somewhere other in the administration than his direct talking points.”
With great respect.
“When they go after the UN ambassador … then they’ve got a problem with me.”
No. Sorry, wrong number. Not happening.
The intel community strikes back?
Plus, leading “suspect” in plain sight — and laughing at the US.
I’m glad your third grader is so worried about trade sanctions, but…
“American liberals were forced to sidestep First Amendment absolutism to combat a political foe”